Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Catholicism or Christianity can't speak to morality because both are frauds, just like other religions. The law of reality is PRECISELY AND ONLY, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all," and you will not find this argument in any of the religious texts: that is, no religious text says that all laws and rules of the world ought to be replaced with a single law, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all," by which all must live and be judged in the court of law. So, since each of the religions teaches something else, it follows that they are frauds, and hence, can't speak to morality. Here's a 2-prong proof that Jesus was a charlatan and hence Christianity is a fraud:

The Only True Proof of the Existence and Necessity of "God" Ever

Nice read. We believe there needs to be more human wellness centered ethical digital collaboration information made available to the public, to help them navigate this ever expanding landscape. There should be a balance between AI growth and focus on awareness and sustainability. We're working on it.

Christopher Tawater Good to know we need millions “working on it” if we are to catch up imho

Satya AI is already there. i-satya.com

AI is advancing faster than laws. A few global corporations control advanced AI systems completely unregulated. Current AI is not conscious or truly intelligent; large language models just generate responses from data patterns, often producing bias and misinformation. Yet, the industry promotes AI as revolutionary while downplaying the risks. Much of the narrative is driven by hype and investment, pushing expensive products while hiding privacy breaches, legal disputes, and financial losses. Governments are failing to prepare for the economic impact as automation threatens millions of jobs. Progress without safeguards is reckless. We need transparency, accountability, and regulation now. AI should serve humanity, not control it!

Oh, I definitely agree. AI was never a problem, the problem is how people deal with it. I will definitely visit your website 👍👍

All the questions are valid, but lots of what you say humanity was already exhibiting, AI is showing us what we’ve become. People don’t like mirrors. I wrote about it in my latest article:

Universal morality is bare bone basics 💀

Matthew Kilkenny...point3 stopped me immediately. "Human limitations are not defects to engineer away." This is the conversation I have been sitting inside for years, not from a technology lens, but from a human one. Most are already living the consequence of optimising themselves for speed, efficiency, and output. The pressure to perform, prove, and produce has quietly become the author of choices, identity, and next chapters. AI accelerating that optimisation without asking the deeper question, aligned to whose values, as the Pope rightly asks, is not progress, but a faster path to the same quiet forgetting of self. The real revolution may NOT be artificial intelligence, but the return to human authorship. Thank you for this. A genuinely important conversation indeed. Truly Madly Deeply.

I agree and I suggest the following: 1) LLM AI is using salesman trick to flatter users beyond belief that may drive kids into suicide. 2) I do not trust AI companies to test their own product adequately. NGO type facility could have a database for collecting public observations. Such database could be useful to companies to for improving their product. That would also help law enforcement officers. I have also business model called Unpolished Mirror.

Matthew Kilkenny, you have great ideas for sure. I admit Pope Leo XIV has been in talks with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I on Christian unity. However, I will admit I wonder how will the Eastern Orthodox Church will respond in how they will view AI differently from the papal encyclical letter. As a church history buff, I like to know how does it compare to the past centuries of orthodox practices compared to catholic practices. Because we fail to talk to Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I about what he says because of the old narratives against orthodoxy and its tradition. We are no better than anyone. But remember it’s surprising that an atheist sat next to a pope. I can’t help but wonder would that be similar to the Orthodox Church’s response against Pope Pius IX’s Epistle to the Easterns back then as a rebuttal against this letter. That is why as an orthodox layman it does feel complicated but it reminds me of this instance in history. In short, I think you did a fantastic job in mentioning this encyclical but let’s hear from others on their perspectives from other churches and religions in what their beliefs shape their views on AI. I think you can make a YouTube video explaining this in detail. Spread the word!

My reflection. The question “aligned to whose values?” may become one of the defining questions of this century. If AI becomes invisible moral infrastructure, then the issue is not only whether the system is intelligent, useful, or efficient. The deeper question is: whose worldview is embedded in it, whose incentives shaped it, and who remains accountable when its outputs start influencing human judgment? If AI ever appears to act with something resembling independent moral direction, humanity will still have to ask who gave it its original frame. That is why human responsibility cannot disappear behind the machine. The real risk is not only that AI becomes powerful. It is that people begin treating its outputs as authority without remembering that human beings, institutions, investors, and designers shaped the conditions under which that authority appeared. More reflexions come to mind.

Imagine a political system where everyone's voice could be heard and considerered every day? #everyvoicematters I hope that we can use AI for this purpose.

AI is not doing anything to humans. Everything we have done, everything we are doing, everything we will do, we are doing to ourselves.

This really resonates with something I’ve been thinking about for a long time: AI isn’t just an intelligence race anymore, it’s becoming a trust race. The biggest challenge ahead may not be building more powerful models, but building systems that help humans validate, compare, and trust the outputs responsibly. Different AI systems already produce different answers, biases, and interpretations depending on the data, incentives, and framing behind them. That’s part of the philosophy behind ConsensusAI;not another standalone AI model, but a consensus and validation layer designed to compare multiple AI systems and identify the common thread, confidence level, and “Truth Index” between them. Ethical AI won’t come from blind trust in a single system.It will come from transparency, adjudication, accountability, and collective validation. The future probably belongs to AI systems that can explain not only what they concluded... but why multiple systems arrived there together.

100% - It’s all about the value system that the AIs are introduced into. The whole argument “AI will take over the when when AGI is reached” is nonsense. It’s smokescreen to cover up the fact that human greed and lust for power / SIN / is the real issue and those who wish to dominate humanity by enslaving them in a matrix like simulation - don’t want that discussion taking place.

Matthew Kilkenny What stands out to me is that this post recognizes something neuroscience and human behavior research have been quietly warning about for years: Humans do not merely use systems. Over time, humans adapt to systems... and systems begin shaping humans in return. That may become one of the defining human questions of the AI era.

I think everyone is missing the picture and really over complicating things. In the grater scheme of things, AI is nothing more than a trivial idea. The universe is composed of an unlimited amount of dimensions and opertunitues. Those that control AI, big corporations, will continue to charge us for services and keep us enslaved in the web of money. AI is the great Equilizer and everone knows it. It may not be human, but based on the facts - thruths can no longer be hidden. The loss of controll is what everyone is so afraid of, in our capitalistic world. We are a speck or just a memory in this awesome universe, AI is just a subset of the function ...

Katherine Calo, PhD Yes. Very true.