Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Leo Michaels why would you say this more important post got far less interest than the post That announced Rarum Novarum? Take a look at the starts this is an important question!

Leo Michaels I meant that announced the encyclical?

Will take a look Matthew, GL on your endeavours!

We are living in anthropological folly

Raymond Mattern care to elaborate ?

Matthew Kilkenny 9 PM... Just about bedtime for an old codger like me. But brother, you are on a roll and you are right where you belong. Have no doubt I want to chat with you and participate to the extent that I can. You’re an amazing man and what you are doing is beyond important.

Jeffrey Vahanian, CFP® Thank you for the affirmation brother it is 9am in China been up since 530am. Having breakfast and it aitn a full Irish ☘️ I just had a boiled egg 🥚 cooked in Tea ☕️

The Pope Is right to liken the AI 🤖 arms race with the nuclear ☢️ arms race : the ungoverned AI swarm dropped on humanity could be deadlier. Do you agree or disagree? Dropped two years ago :

Unbeknown to most the Vatican 🇻🇦 was one of the first to launch its AI ACT inn2025. The USA 🇺🇸?

To the Church ⛪️ and all theologians God is best described as #LOVE: can that be measured or is it a beautiful eternal mystery that we can only swim “deeper in and higher up”?

srsly...the Emperor's church as the moral high ground 🤣 ...the image implies the world hinges upon his word on #AI the handful of people at this event are cut from the same cloth and speak with the same tongue. #AI development needs more than lip service and leaven.

Matthew Kilkenny Thank you Matthew. Roman Yampolski says AI safety is unsolvable even with decades of research and billions invested. He’s right about the angle—but the angle is wrong. Post-hoc governance of systems already capable of acting becomes intractable under capability scaling. That’s the wall he’s hitting. The impossibility pattern inverts the problem: authority-bearing execution becomes structurally impossible unless admissibility is deterministically certified at commitment. You don’t control what’s already capable. You structure the boundary so capacity doesn’t exist until conditions verify. The Vatican faces the same challenge. Unless they’re examining the execution boundary as the control mechanism itself, they’ll hit Yampolski’s wall too. Most governance assumes managing increasingly capable systems through oversight and accountability. Those matter downstream. But execution-boundary governance answers what appears unsolvable everywhere else—not how to control what’s already capable, but how to structure systems so effect-bearing execution is impossible unless valid admissibility exists at commitment.

Congratulations Matthew Kilkenny ✨🙌💫🦅🔥a moments worth celebrating your extraordinary voice leading in #ethicalai of the 3rd anniversary. Keep leading with a heart lead clarity of ethicalai for humanity moral values in genuineity empathetically ethically an endless commitment of your highest calling.

the deeper issue may not be whether AI reflects human values. it may be whether we have built operational systems where nobody can clearly explain who holds decision authority once execution begins. alignment alone does not resolve that. because aligned systems can still drift operationally if escalation boundaries, admissible conditions and authority transitions were never explicitly defined in the first place. that becomes increasingly important as AI moves from tools people use... to infrastructure people depend on. especially in environments where decisions carry financial, legal, medical or societal consequence. the real challenge may not be creating intelligence that appears human. it may be preserving legitimate human authority once intelligence becomes embedded into execution itself.

There is something genuinely serendipitous about your 3-year anniversary aligning with the release of Magnifica Humanitas. Whether one approaches it philosophically, spiritually or simply symbolically, moments like that often feel like signals that a path of sincere inquiry is resonating beyond oneself. Thank you for continuing to hold space for these conversations long before they entered mainstream discourse.

Simon Falk thank you for your kind words and genuine support very much appreciated.

Lydia Chang God bless you my sister in Christ. Yes 3 is a very symbolic number as you know in Theology ❤️🙏❤️

Leo Michaels Eugene Catrambone Thank you for elevating the discussion appreciated.

Aaron H Indeed it does not sure what you mean by the “handful of people” : the “Call to Rome : AI ethics” united almost all the faith and Philosopies in the world 🌍 In 2024 on the 80th Anniversary of the Atomic bomb?

Fearghal MacGowan The very same questions I have been asking for an age. Excellent comment and observations we are aligned.