Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
160
comments matched
· page 8 of 8
To your question, Matthew Kilkenny: As with all transformative technologies, we should examine not only what AI can do but also how our use of it shapes human judgment, relationships, and purpose. Among those addressing this challenge are Pope Leo XIV ... and Klaus Schwab. Schwab describes the "Intelligent Age" as a new historical era in which intelligence, whether human, artificial, or collective, becomes the world's most important resource and organizing principle. In this age, intelligent systems are becoming integrated into nearly every aspect of life, creating a new frontier of power, leadership, and responsibility. The challenge is to combine AI's capabilities with human wisdom, empathy, ethics, and creativity. Progress should be measured by whether technology serves human flourishing, dignity, and the common good. Success will depend on our ability to align technological capability with these human values through cooperation. The responsibility is ours. It is not AI's. See
Altering thoughts or behavior to appease machines (algorithms and data processing) forces self-censorship, curtails authentic expression, purpose, and suppresses individual identity. If AI does not improve and empower human cognition, creativity, and connection, it effectively reduces life to a source of productivity, comparing humans to machines based on speed and efficiency. Each of us was created for so much more! Referring to AI for answers based on the words and creations of humans eliminates the individual quest to explore, think, and act for one’s self. Outsourced thinking and beliefs to a non-human entity is the fastest path to eliminate human values, sovereignty, free will, and domain over the future of life, and the planet. In my humble opinion.
Sarit Williams Agreed which humans are coding AI?
Tanya Magalhaes who or what is coding AI?
I swear, this may be more significant work than all universities combined may have done. What do you think - could this be closer to being an exaggeration, or the truth? Matthew Kilkenny
Rebecca Human AI Trust Leader Thank you for always adding value apologies I am just seeing now.
Chloe C. Devine, excellent comment. Apologies, I am just seeing it now.
James Welniak Excellent apolpgies I am just seeing now.
Ivan Kotov Excellent observations and agreed, apologies I am just seeing now.
Jacqueline Muili Apologies I am just seeing your brilliant wise comment.
Miriam Waymire, excellent comment, apologies just seeing now!
Bobby Joachim thank you for your excellent comment apologies I am just seeing now.
Keiji Deyasu Yes it may well be. Apologies for my late reply.
Matthew Kilkenny Well, it looks well to me as if Universities are being surpassed by their predecessor. Looking forward to learn more about Ethical AI Now.
It’s striking how much the concerns of the Church, AI designers, builders, and users share common roots and deep, overlapping worries. Why, then, is there such a strong push today to frame this extraordinary human creation as dangerous? In many faith traditions, we’re reminded that God placed humanity as stewards and vicegerents on Earth, granting us the profound right to pioneer bold innovations and unique creativity. That gift should be guided by wisdom, not paralyzed by fear. #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #FaithAndTech #Ethics #Innovation #HumanCreativity #Stewardship #ResponsibleAI #TechEthics
Matthew Kilkenny Matthew, Your distinction between permission and reality is exactly where my mind keeps returning. The more I look at it, the more I wonder whether most governance failures are actually continuity failures. A decision is authorized based on a set of assumptions. The environment changes. The assumptions change. The authorization remains. The system stays compliant. Yet reality has already moved on. At that point the risk is no longer who approved the action, but whether the conditions that justified the approval still exist. That creates an interesting possibility: Perhaps governance is not fundamentally the management of authority. Perhaps governance is the continuous reconciliation of authority against changing reality. In that sense, compliance measures adherence to a decision. Continuity measures whether the decision still belongs in the world it was made for. That feels like a very different architecture.
Shawn Bullock, which is why I keep saying, Science and Philosophy can only take us so far: they always eventually collapse into the sacred discipline of Theology. That is THE singularity, and that is a whole new ballgame for an LLM: it cannot go there; WE created it, and now we try to align it with the human soul. The Popes open letter to the world gives us all a roadmap to take very seriously.
Daniel Nicolas Viva La France they beat the Irish ladies football team last night. Well done france for world cup qualifier. Some still have'nt forgiven Henrie's hand of God !
Matthew Kilkenny LOL. You’re right, some moments in football stick with people for years. Funny how accountability shows up everywhere, even in sports. I am however not a sports type of guy but I appreciate. I have been living in Southern California for the past 46 years.
Katherine Calo, PhD, apologies, just seeing your excellent comment now. I will tag you in a comment above.