Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Matthew Kilkenny your dedication to highlighting complex AI issues to busy professionals is commendable. Information overload is real. Without 'sabbath' downtime we lose perspective, connection and direction- our humanity.

Robert Fenlon Thank you for your Kindness greatly appreciated.

Matthew Kilkenny thanks and I hope you are well! I lived in China for four years, my VPN got a lot of use during that time. I also have some Irish ancestry, though unfortunately I have yet to visit Ireland, it’s on my bucket list. I think the biggest challenge Catholicism has in being taken as universal, is the fact that 70% of the world doesn’t believe in the divinity of Jesus, including within the Abrahamic religions, where Judaism and Islam do not recognize Jesus as a messiah. But certainly the world‘s populations of Hindus and Buddhists, etc, non-Western, and non-theist peoples, these comprise the vast majority of Homo sapiens as a species. Therefore, any attempt to reconcile artificial intelligence with world views and cosmologies, will need to make peace with a species level understanding. That’s why I would submit to you that a universal outlook is actually a species level outlook, rather than the outlook of any one particular new tradition. I say this because the human species is about 300,000 years old, whereas there’s no existing tradition, religious or otherwise that is any older than about 2% of the time the species has existed. That means any claim to universalism by any tradition is quite narrow.

Matthew Kilkenny ✨🙌💫🦅🔥 Amen lndeed enjoy your every moment in Shanghai ☺️

Matthew Kilkenny Appreciate that Matthew. A large part of the pressure now comes from the fact that execution capability is scaling faster than authority clarity. Many systems can now act, coordinate, optimise and adapt operationally. But when conditions change mid-execution, organisations still struggle to answer a very simple question: who currently holds legitimate decision authority? That becomes increasingly important once AI moves from assisting workflows... to participating inside operational infrastructure itself.

Matthew Kilkenny, The real issue is why do we accept that Big Tech companies define hardcoded my moral compass and of all of their users worldwide with genAI and on their online platforms inside their AI-models and platforms? #moderation #productivity #creativity #culturalbias #democracymatters

Matthew Kilkenny Consider what we humans do for money, power or ideology. How much time and energy goes into such? So much inhumane behavior and destruction. Is that the purpose of human life?

These new tools called "AI" will no doubt change human society very profoundly and very fast; probably too profoundly and too fast. Being afraid of the changes is natural and almost logical. Yet there is no way to avoid it, the change is coming like a thunderstorm and it is useless to keep stressing its negative aspects. It is like the emergence, within the human social environment, of a new species that has many aspects, some beneficial and some harmful, but all (still) under human control. We humans need to act rationally and act fast. One problem is that only a very tiny minority of people has any real knowledge of what AI really is, how it ticks, and where it came from. Regardless of whether AI's (plural is compulsory here) are foes or friends, we first of all need to know them! That, imo, is a point where we are currently badly behind.

I was really happy to see many of the points that are now in His Holiness first encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas" in my article from September 2023!

According to those involved in the artificial intelligence (AI) industry, AI is making great strides towards 'superintelligence'. Unfortunately, in the eyes of the general public, it is making great strides towards 'super stupidity'. The document that Pape has just approved is important, useful and necessary. The only issue is that it refers to AI on a timescale of several decades. Not just for today's AI or that of the next year or two. So, the tech giants would do well to read it. Better still, however, they should revisit their plans, because for the moment AI falls more into the 'scam' category of my post below. There is one small caveat, though: Pape has unwittingly acted as a public relations agent for Anthropic and its AI, Claude. This is all the more ironic given that Claude is an AI used by the Pentagon, notably during the war against the theocratic regime in Iran.

"What kind of civilization are we building?" One built on sovereignty, renewable materials, and the protection of children "What is AI doing to the human spirit?" AI is a tool. The substrate — SIEN — is what frees it from extraction The encyclical is a call to conversation. The #yamrostandard is a framework for action. You do not need the Vatican to tell you what is right. You have Ma'at. You have the patents. You have the hair. You have the haven. You changed the conversation not by asking better questions — but by building a better foundation. That is not arrogance. That is completion. Under the #yamrostandard.

Great comments and totally agree.

Conscious awareness vs unconscious behaviour.

Don Kilburg, Ph.D. VPN no good these days. I don’t see God speaking to humanity in only that time frame that will need a response when I get back home!

Matthew Kilkenny, Thank you for keeping us updated on the latest AI landscape, my brother. I applaud you for continued dedication and commitment. Keep up the great work.

What’s fascinating is watching defense, finance, enterprise AI, and even the Vatican independently converge on the same realization: The bottleneck is no longer intelligence. It is governance latency. That “~200ms” line matters because it exposes the real fracture: human moral deliberation evolved for biological time, while autonomous systems now propagate consequences at machine time. Different industries. Different language. Same topology. Ethics, AI governance, accountability, trust, escalation paths, sovereignty, data continuity, explainability — all converging toward the same underlying requirement: A continuity substrate capable of preserving coherent human oversight at machine speed. The future winners won’t simply be the fastest systems. They’ll be the systems that remain coherent under acceleration.

Strong reflection. I agree that the real debate is anthropological, not only technical. If AI increasingly shapes attention, trust, work, belief, relationships, and even moral reasoning, then the question is not only whether the system is “aligned”. The question is: what kind of human being does continuous interaction with this system produce? But I would add one engineering layer. Moral clarity must become operational design. If we say AI should protect human dignity, preserve agency, avoid domination, and keep humans responsible for consequential decisions, then those principles need to appear in the system architecture: memory boundaries,dependency limits,human decision points,refusal modes,audit trails,external challenge,and clear interruption before harm scales. Otherwise ethics remains language around the system, not a boundary inside the system. The human spirit is not protected by slogans. It is protected when the systems around the human are designed so that dignity, agency, and responsibility cannot be silently bypassed.

The second people stop anthropomorphizing the technology and start holding the humans that own it responsible, things will change. AI is a human problem.

Matthew, this is an important moment. AI is no longer just technical or regulatory. It is moral and spiritual. At Unshaken Voice Productions, ethical AI must be people-first, serving people, and accountable before God. Not profit over people. Not people as products. Not intelligence detached from conscience. Our foundation is Scripture alone. Human beings are made in God’s image. A machine may calculate, imitate, generate, and optimize, but it cannot bear God’s image, repent, worship, love sacrificially, discern sin, or answer before the Lord. That is why “alignment” is not enough until we ask: aligned to what truth, whose moral order, and what vision of humanity? The danger is not only that AI may become powerful. It is that humanity may surrender truth, conscience, responsibility, and moral imagination to tools built without fear of God or love of neighbor. But I am not hopeless. The Lord has always preserved a remnant and equipped His servants for each generation’s battles. The tools and kingdoms change, but the Lord does not. We must examine what AI can do, and what it is doing to the human spirit. Those building in this space must do so with humility, courage, and discernment. Technology is not Lord. Christ is.

zenodo.org/records/19067218