Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Jeffrey Vahanian, CFP® Thank you for the affirmation brother it is 9am in China been up since 530am. Having breakfast and it aitn a full Irish ☘️ I just had a boiled egg 🥚 cooked in Tea ☕️

Since you mentioned the Pope I'll offer a sort of alternative but I've also got something to put on the main thread... it's a unique situation for people to begin to recognize the flaws and true flaws in human nature. But it's a rare sort of leader and I exclude both Bernie and the pope who can lead us through such a thing without manifesting the flaws common to man. (Bernie like Hennry Kissneger realizes the issue, but again few can address that issue without wrecking individual liberty). https://youtu.be/ZIu-8DzRxcY

The one man I would never trust to square that circle is Bernie. I will however suggest a candidate for debunking the toxic hype surrounding the new technology. This is not Whatley's only series. But the 4th video on this series makes a great (I believe sound) argument. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGG1QEi0aquj47bYQW2IVUxLSApdJ1Lqm

While I am not a fan or supporter of Bernie Sanders usually, he raises a very valid and important question again. Others have raised similar questions, and I posted something about it a while back. The human factors around AI as a tool are what we all should be concerned about. Who designs it and builds it? Why? What purposes will it serve? Who controls it, and how? What happens when it gets misused? Will perceived benefits really be beneficial? Who monitors the monitors? And so on... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jamesgulledge_artificialintelligence-ai-activity-7322992571931148289-2Sgk?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAADIWTEB8VU6Zr42wvgFrC2UQ-g-ynBw5JM

Socialist Propaganda

The Pope Is right to liken the AI 🤖 arms race with the nuclear ☢️ arms race : the ungoverned AI swarm dropped on humanity could be deadlier. Do you agree or disagree? Dropped two years ago : https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ethical-ai-now_ethics-linkedincommunity-ethicalainow-activity-7359542817179770880-4KcX

This is exactly why private AI infrastructure matters. AI is useful. The problem is not AI. The problem is stacking metered tools until the “automation” costs more than the work it replaced. At some point, serious businesses will stop asking, “Which AI subscription should we add next?” They will start asking, “Which parts of this should we own?” That is the shift.

Unbeknown to most the Vatican 🇻🇦 was one of the first to launch its AI ACT inn2025. The USA 🇺🇸? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ethical-ai-now_elonmusk-ethicalainow-romecall-activity-7286712205780123648-73NM

To the Church ⛪️ and all theologians God is best described as #LOVE: can that be measured or is it a beautiful eternal mystery that we can only swim “deeper in and higher up”? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ethical-ai-now_linjedinfamily-algorethics-romecall-activity-7270433285367808000-nXPb

srsly...the Emperor's church as the moral high ground 🤣 ...the image implies the world hinges upon his word on #AI the handful of people at this event are cut from the same cloth and speak with the same tongue. #AI development needs more than lip service and leaven.

Let’s see what’s will be next…

Is that guy barefoot? Yes, that’s all I got out of that.

Very much informative 👏

Emotional intelligence is becoming the real competitive advantage. Insightful post by Justin Wright discussing how high performers often succeed because of emotional discipline, not just technical intelligence. • Self-awareness prevents unnecessary conflict • Empathy strengthens leadership influence • Calm responses build psychological safety • Emotional control protects long-term decisions • Respectful communication multiplies trust Also appreciated the reflections shared by professionals in the comments discussing emotional maturity in workplaces. “The strongest minds are usually the calmest under pressure.” “Reaction is instinct. Response is intelligence.” “A person who understands emotions leads differently.” Modern leadership is no longer about domination. It is about emotional regulation, listening, and creating environments where people feel psychologically safe enough to contribute honestly. Warm regards, Dr.(India ) Dhruv Bhikadiya 📍 Timmins, Ontario 📧 drpatel7171@gmail.com LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-india-dhruv-bhikadiya-a0126929a/ Blogspot https://www.blogger.com/profile/17598354791574873222 Academia https://independent.academia.edu/DhruvPatel626

Sure, choose humans because we are cheaper. No problem with that!

Matthew Kilkenny Thank you Matthew. Roman Yampolski says AI safety is unsolvable even with decades of research and billions invested. He’s right about the angle—but the angle is wrong. Post-hoc governance of systems already capable of acting becomes intractable under capability scaling. That’s the wall he’s hitting. The impossibility pattern inverts the problem: authority-bearing execution becomes structurally impossible unless admissibility is deterministically certified at commitment. You don’t control what’s already capable. You structure the boundary so capacity doesn’t exist until conditions verify. The Vatican faces the same challenge. Unless they’re examining the execution boundary as the control mechanism itself, they’ll hit Yampolski’s wall too. Most governance assumes managing increasingly capable systems through oversight and accountability. Those matter downstream. But execution-boundary governance answers what appears unsolvable everywhere else—not how to control what’s already capable, but how to structure systems so effect-bearing execution is impossible unless valid admissibility exists at commitment.

Bernie is a taker, not a maker. Anyone wants power and control? Go MAKE IT!

IMO, Magnifica Humanitas is not simply about “AI ethics” in the usual sense. It frames AI as an anthropological challenge. The question is not only how to regulate tools, or how to balance risks and benefits. It asks what kind of human beings and societies are being formed around intelligent systems. That is why the Babel and Jerusalem imagery matters. The choice is not merely pro-technology or anti-technology. It is between systems organized around power, uniformity and self-sufficiency — and systems organized around dignity, responsibility, repair and shared human flourishing. That makes the document much richer than a general call for responsible AI.

Philip Browning thank you for pointing this out. I love Clara’s focus on schools as civilizational institutions

Felipe Witchger .. John C. Havens might be worth a conversation with… re your enquiry. Sad America is a darker place since our conversations. Best p