Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Daamn! Bernie makes them sound like communi… wait a minute…. 😂😂

💡 𝟗𝟓% 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐄𝐐. That insight from Justin Wright deserves serious attention in today’s leadership culture. Emotional intelligence is not weakness. It is controlled strength. • Listening before reacting • Staying calm under pressure • Creating psychological safety • Respecting emotions without losing logic • Helping others feel heard and valued These are rare professional superpowers. “𝐄𝐐 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞.” “𝐏𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥.” “𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.” In healthcare and leadership environments, technical skills may open opportunities, but emotional intelligence determines long-term trust,. 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐯𝐞𝐬. Dr.(India) Dhruv Bhikadiya 📍 Timmins, Ontario 📧 drpatel7171@gmail.com 🔗 https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-india-dhruv-bhikadiya-a0126929a/ 🎓 https://independent.academia.edu/DhruvPatel626

Opium-ization of human cognition and concentration of power and wealth into the hand of 4-5 AI giants. Question is can we able to keep the balance?

Concerns like this are why some push against adoption altogether. But it's becoming clear that the technology is here to stay. We're now left with the responsibility of figuring out how to adopt it safely in a way that benefits people broadly, not just a few. We need more AI-centered conversations to unpack these issues and better understand the direction we’re heading in.

Fasting is not simply the absence of food it is a biologic signal that shifts the body from constant consumption toward repair, adaptation, and cellular resilience.

Correct

Bubble is yet to burst😅

Haha this is quite funny actually. I think there is going to be a reality, as Elon says, where we will not have to work anymore (universal basic income) and that will come much faster than people think actually. They predict that all computer and desk jobs will disappear in the next ten years. Everything will be run by AI and agents so I suppose we will have much more time and much more freedom and therefore there will be a lot of health issues actually because people are moving less. We move less and less. (Uber eats, e-com... If I had to give one thought about what is the best industry to work in in the next 20 years, it's going to be the food industry, the health industry, and the housing industry because those 3 industries will never change. The human body, up until now, still hasn't evolved in thousands of years and it will still need to have shelter, eat something, and be in good health. All the rest is completely obsolete due to AI and the arrival of quantum computers.

This level of AI integration could completely redefine public service efficiency worldwide.

🤔

One of the first books I ever purchased, because I was intrigued by the title, was Paul Tillich's The Courage to Be. Probably time to dust it off, jump on the couch during a rainy afternoon, and revisit it. I know it reinforced some thoughts I'd already had about life, the universe and everything. Thanks Clara for reminding me of its existence. Paul Tillich's The Courage to Be is widely regarded as a brilliant, foundational text of 20th-century religious and philosophical thought. It explores how modern humans can conquer existential anxiety—such as the fear of death, meaninglessness, and guilt—by affirming their own existence through radical courage.

After reading Ayn Rand, more will understand the issues. It is what it is. The change is not comming, it is allready existant. thos who allready have the power now, won't give it up. Question standing, how will wealth or even worse, surviving look like within the next 5 Years.

Everyone focused on AI capability.Very few questioned AI unit economics.

Strong framing. From a founder’s POV, the AI question is not just capability, it is governance. If the value created by AI is not tied to clear ownership, incentives, and access, faster systems can scale the wrong outcomes just as quickly.

For one thing I think the fall will be far greater for the rich the day money becomes useless. Then the next step is unification, one world. No more separation of poor and rich. People will no longer live in places where environment is not sustainable.

AI is powerful, but scaling it without understanding the economics can become more expensive than the problem it was solving.

Thank you for this. Super helpful.

Pascal The real AI debate is becoming less about capability and more about who controls the systems and how the outcomes affect society.

I don’t believe that entrepreneurs like Bezos or Musk are inherently driven by greed or a desire for power only. Rather, the system they operate in is structured in a way that demands continuous growth. If they are not consistently increasing wealth and expanding their influence, they risk becoming irrelevant. This expectation of indefinite growth creates pressure that goes beyond individual intent. Today technology and science can really solve many of the humanities problems but who is eager to invest in such work which has lesser potential of return than something else.

Great to see the focus on transparency and security, especially with the SynthID adoption. However, as we approach the 'foothills of the singularity' and empower these agentic systems, the challenge isn't just transparency—it's the robustness of the agents themselves against sophisticated prompt injection and environment manipulation. Ready to see these models pushed to their limits in real-world red teaming.