Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Real power and in

Leo Michaels why would you say this more important post got far less interest than the post That announced Rarum Novarum? Take a look at the starts this is an important question!

Leo Michaels I meant that announced the encyclical?

Will take a look Matthew, GL on your endeavours!

We are living in anthropological folly

The think–build–check loop is a simple but powerful way to describe what good development already looks like, just faster with better tools.

The frustration many people feel with AI coding often comes from skipping the same steps that make traditional software reliable in the first place.

What stands out is the emphasis on ownership, AI can accelerate execution, but the responsibility for architecture and quality still sits with the human.

Yup, incredible how many people “read” the encyclical just to vomit the same and shallow takes on social media. I decided that I will not talk about it until I’ve read it and meditated it all.

Very sad state for sure. Something awry. I can understand why the company would want to whitewash their platform but Abrahamic Monotheism is a relatively new phenomena and does not speak for majority of the world view - and certainly not for those who cannot speak for themselves: animals, birds, rivers, forests. Satya AI does. i-satya.com Endorsed by humans.

I’m not Catholic and I haven’t read the entire encyclical, but I agree with everthing I’ve heard reported. I’m all about leaning into AI, but we need to maintain strong ethical boundaries on its use.

The Day 1 advice to "Do one real work task" is the most important part. A tutorial shows what is possible. A real task shows what is practical and where you need to provide better context to get a useful result.

TCOY Wellness fasting 👍🏻👍🏻✅

Greed, power & … If I don’t do it, he will So, the fear of losing to the next competitor

Plz send it to tpo@dypiemr@ac.in

Raymond Mattern care to elaborate ?

Where is AI taking us? That’s the question we should be asking. Not just what AI can do, but what it means for us as humans, businesses, and society. Are we moving toward a future where humans become more efficient, more creative, and more capable? Or are we quietly becoming dependent on systems we no longer fully understand? The real question behind AI is not just about technology. It’s about **purpose, control, and responsibility**. What’s the backup plan if AI changes faster than our ability to adapt? Interested in your thoughts: Are we building AI to serve humanity — or slowly shaping humanity

Matthew Kilkenny 9 PM… Just about bedtime for an old codger like me. But brother, you are on a roll and you are right where you belong. Have no doubt I want to chat with you and participate to the extent that I can. You’re an amazing man and what you are doing is beyond important.

Human Centric frameworks that puts AI-Forward is a good balance. But orgs who put AI-First without having that Human I. The loop are starting to realize the drawbacks.

The speed of these updates is wild. I'm especially interested to see how CodeMender handles those security fixes in real-time.