Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Calling idiots out on bullshit should be prevalent and damaging. We have to stop…
rdc_e2whqvf
G
8:32 what a roundabout way of saying COMPAS is ridiculously racist in its assump…
ytc_UgwY-6m4I…
G
This Dr Y guy. No disrespect. He has good intentions for safety humanity r/t AI …
ytc_Ugx34gJzT…
G
Don't leave the cat outside. A human driver could have killed the cat just as ea…
ytc_Ugz__WTHi…
G
Robot: "Master what is my purpose?"
Master: "You pass butter."
Robot: "Oh my God…
ytc_Ugw7cMFZr…
G
@shirragamedevHoly moly I had a big ol reply typed up, and accidently got rid o…
ytr_UgyDVPhyD…
G
Using ai while an entire LANGUAGE of their vas are on strike against ai is batsh…
ytc_UgwM-19RS…
G
Who will own the AI? That’s the problem I think. Not the Ai. Who is controlling …
ytc_UgwhRZajA…
Comment
When did America become so insecure in the face of Chinese innovation that it resorts to bans and suppression instead of rising to the challenge? True competition should inspire improvement, not instill fear. Yet today, the U.S. appears gripped by inferiority complex—unable to outpace China in AI, it seeks to hinder progress rather than accelerate its own.
The recent backlash against ByteDance's Seedance 2.0, which has stunned Hollywood with its cinematic video generation capabilities, exemplifies this. Instead of embracing the breakthrough as motivation to innovate faster, the response has been panic, copyright accusations, and calls for restrictions. Banning or demonizing superior tools from abroad doesn't restore American leadership; it only highlights the gap and delays genuine advancement.
America risks becoming the loser in this race not because China is unbeatable, but because fear has replaced ambition. Healthy rivalry drives excellence—suppression merely admits defeat.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-02-23T09:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugya0EkO0nEG-aYbJBh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgyOZ9elgDGolgsADpR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgxN8DJNCLrG6gBiqtN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugxaj_3ynr_qo7u1Lgl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgznN9-Ztlim8Rescs14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxIAjqXcU3rm5OI_td4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxuWdFGUx4Bbi1yPDZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgzrM94aAtKjci9eB6F4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgzXSiK-MUKDA7kSscd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzwkO9VOe_vPTH42AF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]