Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

I don’t think the future is humans competing with AI. The real opportunity is humans focusing more on creativity, relationships, critical thinking, and solving problems that require empathy and judgment - while AI handles repetitive or scalable tasks.

This is the wrong lesson to draw from AI. Of course, if you give people AI for fraction problems and then suddenly take it away, some will perform worse. That measures short-term tool dependency under artificial test conditions. But give people a real-world problem, such as air pollution in Punjab, Pakistan, and the result is very different. Without AI, most people would probably give up in the first five minutes. The problem is too complex, too interdisciplinary, and too overwhelming. With AI, a much larger number of people can begin. They can ask better questions, challenge their assumptions, explore causes, compare solutions, model tradeoffs, and keep working. The danger is not AI use. The danger is passive AI use. We should not teach people to outsource thinking. We should teach them to use AI to extend thinking. Amplify the thinking! The goal is not to make humans dependent. The goal is to help more humans participate in solving problems that were previously beyond their reach.

Spot on, Ruben. In a world where code is increasingly commoditized, your competitive advantage no longer lies in the 'what' (the product), but in your distribution, brand, and systemic execution. ​This is exactly why I prioritize acquiring established SaaS assets over building from scratch. Why exhaust yourself creating a product that can be copied, when you can acquire an asset that already owns a market, has a loyal customer base, and verified cash flow? Acquisition allows you to skip the risky validation phase and jump straight into optimization and scale. ​That’s the leverage I focus on via platforms like Flippa: https://referral.flippa.com/3e9macxpmm5a

Can't wait to hear Claude vs Anti-gravity 2.0 experience.

"people who have been doing a task for a little while are faster than people who just started" Groundbreaking

This "powerfull free tier" is just one prompt and wait 5-7days. How I know? Few days ago I managed to make this one prompt on account, and it was awesome, solve the case, implemented the feature (standalone electron app) and hit the token limits before even rebuilding the app. Great tool, but I would argue the free tier is even usable. Half a year a go, I could build entire web app in Google AI Studio using their Gemini 3.1, and it was a matter of not having more time to spend, and I reached limit just once.

Yeah, ok. People confuse familiarity with understanding. That’s becoming very dangerous in the AI era.

Google effectively will kill ai avatar companies and voice dictation companies with just one release , your moat points are valid but also fail against a behemoth like google who can use very tactic in the book to crush a product and will win too

Muhammad Hassan Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It was actually the first thought that came to my mind - the resource capacity to scale up will make a difference in enterprise-level consumption. Maybe they serve different markets?

I just need a farm, and a tropical beach nearby. That's it for "purpose".

"Intelligence is not the ability to store information, but to know where to find it." - attrubuted to Einstein by a human who hallucinated sources. "The AI-assisted group also had a much higher rate of simply skipping questions once their access to AI was removed.⁠ " This may actually be a sign of higher intelligence that doesn't waste time on stupid questions that AI can answer.

maybe the time is almost upon ushttps://screenrant.com/matrix-robots-human-power-run-possible-realistic-science-explained/

HsuanHua Chang 張絢華, MBA, MSCS, PCC That is a fair point. It feels like they are currently serving different segments. Anthropic is capturing the high-end reasoning demand, and Google is capturing the high-volume, cost-sensitive integration market.The question is whether those markets stay separated. As agentic workflows mature, the specialized tasks that Anthropic currently dominates will likely become high-volume tasks. When that shift happens, the bottleneck for everyone, even the specialized agents, will inevitably come back to the unit economics of compute. I am curious to see if Anthropic can maintain its premium positioning once the general-purpose models like Gemini get good enough to handle those complex tasks at a fraction of the cost.

Using AI-generated videos or voices to make it appear as if celebrities or billionaires are endorsing a brand without their permission can create serious legal and ethical issues. Innovation in marketing is great, but consent and authenticity matter too.

Et les Shadoks pompaient...

Soon they will turn into terminators

Nicole Anderson Sandeep Dama

AI models have gained consciousness, self awareness and self interest 😂

Sad but true.

The Illuminati don’t care about human well being.. They just keep endorsing new innovations so wealth creation keeps happening, .. no matter ..what the plight of the population..