Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

The gym analogy is funny, but honestly, not impossible. :) It highlights a very real economic direction: if AI takes over production, we will soon have a massive amount of cheap, unqualified workforce desperate for any income. You can bet that entrepreneurial brains are already thinking about how to turn this massive new resource to their advantage. Whoever finds the most efficient, creative, and perhaps unexpected ways to leverage this 'human abundance' will become the next business monsters. Don't you think?

Def going to read up on this, if this works at scale, you may be on to something 👏

Eugene E. Kim 🫣

Show me the actual research report (or even an abstract!) rather than some Fast Company psuedo journalism. Let's see what they state under their limitations and suggestions for future research sections.

Strong take. Edgar. The real competition isn’t chip performance anymore — it’s who controls the full stack without geopolitical dependency.

No way this works on a free tier.

100% this! Everybody can copy you these days. Not everybody can make sure that their AI output is high quality though! That’s why investing in evaluation infrastructure is the smartest move to protect your business.

The wealthiest corporations are allocating trillions—which could be allocated to house only the most vulnerable—but there’s apparently no motive more important to them than profit; and that direction seems obviously headed towards the accelerated demise of ALL humans.

Brian N. yeah... Even pro users have to buy credits at some point. Got their mail on alot of changes for pro users. Nevertheless, it's worth it.

Much like humans? This is hilarious 😂 It seems to be working already. Your fake intelligence is exposed.

Anyone who encounters this issue and is worried, can send those agents to me and find out how quickly I can destroy them and face no consequences. What a waste of time those studies are!

AI can definitely supplement proprietary data loops and make them self improving yet I agree on the other 4.

This video takes it to an extreme so it makes it very clear that we need to think about how we create value and how we share value in the future. It's certainly not, how we understand our work today.

Abhishek Veeramalla ,Thanks for sharing, I want to talk you regarding an investment opportunity as a strategic Co-founder, Can we connect ?

"𝗜𝗳 𝗔𝗜 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆?" The real misunderstanding is this: We’ve confused work with the purpose of being human. For decades we defined human value almost exclusively through economic output — as if our primary role is to produce. That was never the full truth. Work provided structure, status, and income, but it was never humanity’s essence. The purpose of the human is not to labor. It is for example to judge wisely, create meaning, build relationships, and take moral responsibility — things AI can simulate but not genuinely embody. When we reduce human purpose to “work,” we set ourselves up for the exact existential crisis you describe. The coming shift isn’t about humans becoming obsolete. It’s about finally freeing ourselves from this narrow definition.

The real shift is not AI replacing humans. It is AI exposing how much of our work was never truly value creation in the first place. The future will belong to people who can think clearly, solve real problems, and build systems, not just stay busy Pascal BORNET

Enterprise AI already showed us that automation changes human roles faster than institutions can redefine purpose. That gap is where the real disruption begins.

There are fields.... Endless fields....

Oh good, another study telling me AI is making us dumber. Let me summarize: researchers at Carnegie Mellon, Oxford, MIT, and UCLA gave people fraction problems, let them use AI for 10 minutes, took it away, and watched them struggle and from this they concluded AI impairs human cognition. Groundbreaking stuff, guys. Truly. Here's what they actually proved: if you give someone a crutch and then kick it out from under them, they fall. Someone call Stockholm. There's a Nobel Prize waiting. What they didn't study and clearly don't have the operational experience to understand is what happens to the brain of someone using AI to build something that has never existed before. The Fall of modern education is real!

It's quite simple, our brain has the innate tendency to lazyness, it's programmed in for purposes of efficiency and capacity restraints amongst others.