Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Yes, Trisha. Making AI accessible is what enables meaningful and scalable impact.

Strong breakdown this makes AI adoption feel practical instead of overwhelming.

I agree with you that this deserves slow reading, not instant certainty dressed up as analysis. What I find especially striking is that a papal encyclical brings AI out of the usual tech-policy bubble and places it inside a much older conversation about dignity, power, truth, and what kind of beings we are becoming. The point about humaneness also makes me think about faith, in the broadest sense: the ability to live with mystery, devotion, hope, and moral responsibility beyond calculation. It is hard to imagine AI ever developing a need for faith, or the vulnerability that makes faith possible. That may be one of the sharper differences between intelligence as performance and humanity as inner life.

A lot of people think EQ is about being nice all the time. In reality some of the highest EQ leaders I’ve met are the ones willing to have the hard conversation calmly instead of avoiding it.

The development of artificial intelligence is intrinsically linked to the deployment of infrastructures that demand investments of trillions of dollars. And who is able to do this if not the richest companies in the world? The State? Definitely not.

Emotional intelligence is becoming one of the most valuable leadership advantages in high-performance environments. 🙏🏼

The layoffs are not solely because of AI. AI exposed the problems already exists in the system. Layoffs are labelled as AI layoffs. You see when task is done 5-10 times faster with the help of AI tools, then it can't be totally unreal.

Last week I used ChatGPT to bake a cheesecake. Yesterday I polished my cover letter while applying for a new job. Today I’m learning German grammar using the same ChatGPT. What exactly is wrong with that? The Holy Inquisition managed to operate just fine without AI, and apparently that worked out “great” too. Is it even possible to come up with something more stupid than treating AI itself as some existential moral threat instead of just another tool humans use? And yes, I deliberately polished this comment with ChatGPT.

just can’t stand his reference to billionaires

Exactly, Martin. Clarity is what turns complexity into something usable.

Great insights SAURABH SINGH! The current unit economics are definitely a reality check. However, do you think this is a permanent ceiling or just the "dial-up" phase of AI pricing? I'm curious when infrastructure costs might mature and drop enough to flip that 23% MIT metric.

John Elrick absolutely correct. Patrick Dempsey recently suggested that it is like a giant spotlight that was turned on. We never noticed these flaws before, but now they are obvious.

Is there someone who can personally present the Doctrine of the #SystemOfConsciousness to Pope Leo and Mr Christopher Olah and tell them to stop? There are still plenty of "PROBLEMS" in the world without them. Christopher Olah has reached such a level and gone so far that he has developed nostalgia for the Middle Ages. It seems the Vatican also wants to return to the Middle Ages with the help of AI #PopeStopNonsense #OlahStopNonsense #SymbolicAI #CognitiveArchitecture #AIandHumanity #PhilosophyOfAI #ArtificialIntelligence, #AIAlignment.

I love Claude and need to try Claude design. My only dislike is that when scheduling items to run in Cowork you need to be in Claude for it to run. Has anyone found a way around that? Am I missing something?

The deeper challenge may be that concepts such as dignity, truth, justice, and peace are not universally interpreted in identical ways across cultures, legal systems, and philosophical traditions. As AI systems become global, governance may increasingly require frameworks capable not only of defining values, but of preserving coherence between diverse interpretations of those values.

Enterprise AI works best when intelligence, context, action, and connectivity are designed together.

EQ usually shows up most in the moments that test you, not the easy ones. How someone handles pressure, feedback, and conflict tells you a lot about how they lead Justin Wright.

Well said, Anna. Integration is what turns individual capabilities into real outcomes.

A good 100 years ago a man noticed that his factory workers became much more productive due to his invention. He was thinking - I can now produce 100% more than my competitors in the same amount of time. Fantastic news, I'll be more rich.Than he though again. What if I try something else? I give my people an option to work much less time. What happens?So he did. He reduced work from 12 hours per day / 6 days per week to 8 hours per day / 5 days per week.People were impressed. Henry Ford became popular. Employees from other companies rushed to work for his company. He was able to choose the best.Other owners complained to him. They hated the fact that he decided to shorten workload for people. They were sure that they were about to earn less.Decades later, they all made money and people lived better lives. New rich people emerged, some rich people became poor.Same thing will happen now. Some rich owners will use AI to improve people's lives. Some rich people will not decide so. The first who do will win. The latter will loose.Rich people cannot be rich without a mass of people being in average. And this mass eventually chooses the top leader.

Professor John Hearn I think that at the PhD level we have the instrument to cross-check. Yearly VIVA, final VIVA, supervisors' expertise are enough. It will probably put a clamp on random PhDs that were self-funded that we got onboard on topics we do not care about and we do not have time/interest to learn. And it will probably restrict a bit the topics, and methodologies. The masters level is trickier because the numbers go up. So probably a call for removing thesis at the masters level, or having dual track masters, in which the thesis can be done only by students with top grades and it will require a domain restriction. The thesis cannot be about anything, it can only be about a topic we have an expert on, that wants to monitor the student.