Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
I’m not Catholic and I haven’t read the entire encyclical, but I agree with ever…
7465197218581…
in
A phenomenal perspective on what's happening in the UAE right now. Dubai and Ab…
7464676089546…
in
Thnx for sharing your thoughts on this since that in itself moves the broader di…
7465176302447…
in
I thought AI slop online couldn't get any worse, proven wrong by this. If there …
7463953015138…
in
Always friendly answers, but not always what you need in the specific context. A…
7469441951348…
in
Honestly the moat I'd add is the 200 wrong versions you built before the right o…
7464141693907…
in
Yes, students can now use AI to generate essays without deeply reading books, bu…
7464544750688…
in
Fascinating glimpse into AI's accelerating capabilities and the crucial need for…
7468678138588…
Comment
Last week I used ChatGPT to bake a cheesecake. Yesterday I polished my cover letter while applying for a new job. Today I’m learning German grammar using the same ChatGPT. What exactly is wrong with that? The Holy Inquisition managed to operate just fine without AI, and apparently that worked out “great” too. Is it even possible to come up with something more stupid than treating AI itself as some existential moral threat instead of just another tool humans use? And yes, I deliberately polished this comment with ChatGPT.
LinkedIn
AI Policy & Regulation
Materials’ R&D | Python I SQL I Statistical Dat…
2026-05-26T11:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | human_autonomy |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker implies that AI is just a tool for humans to use, and that it does not pose an existential moral threat, which suggests a desire to maintain human control and agency over AI. |
| Target justification | The speaker shares their personal experiences with using ChatGPT, indicating that they are considering the benefits and uses of AI from the perspective of an individual user. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:15:21Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "human_autonomy",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker implies that AI is just a tool for humans to use, and that it does not pose an existential moral threat, which suggests a desire to maintain human control and agency over AI.",
"target_justification": "The speaker shares their personal experiences with using ChatGPT, indicating that they are considering the benefits and uses of AI from the perspective of an individual user."
}
```