Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

The step-by-step structure here is useful because most people struggle less with the tool itself and more with turning it into part of their actual workflow. What usually makes the difference is not the setup on day one, but whether the workflows become reliable enough to use repeatedly in real work without creating extra review or cleanup later.

Faster systems don’t automatically mean fairer systems — that gap is where the real debate is. Pascal BORNET

Sometimes, Emotion - Pause - Reflect - Respond method gives very few seconds to respond. Unless the human mind is trained, the mind looses it's awareness and gets to Emotion - Reaction mode.

The piece that gets overlooked most: stimulation without restoration backfires. You can do all the puzzles and learning you want, but if sleep and stress aren't managed, you're just grinding a tired engine. The toolkit needs both fuel and repair.

The real decisions about AI aren't happening in debates — they're happening in boardrooms, legislation drafts, and funding rounds most people never see. Every model trained, every platform scaled, every policy delayed is a structural choice dressed up as a technical one. We're not just building tools — we're encoding who gets leverage and who gets left out. The question of "what AI can do" is settled; the question of "who it does it for" is still wide open. And whoever fills that silence first will shape the default for everyone else.

“People will forget what you said, but they’ll never forget how you made them feel.”- Maya Angelou After 20+ years leading teams, I believe EQ is self-awareness, empathy, listening, and staying calm under pressure.  You build it through experience, feedback, difficult conversations, and learning to understand people and  not just processes.

The EdTech point 👏🏾 If the systems being deployed in learning environments carry the values and blind spots of their creators, then the question is not just what AI teaches but who is equipped to critically mediate it. That falls on educators and managers. And most of them have not been prepared for that responsibility. We talk a lot about AI governance at the policy and platform level. We talk very little about governance at the human layer, the people who sit between the algorithm and the learner, or between the algorithm and the employee. Quiet credibility is exactly right. And it has to be built at every level of an organization, not just at the top.

🤔!

Such an important reminder. Emotional intelligence is often talked about as a “soft skill,” yet in practice it is one of the biggest differentiators between leaders who simply deliver results and those who build sustainable, high-performing teams.

Paulina Krukowska Your leniency towards an organisation that has committed crimes against humanity ever since its existence began might be appreciated by fellow bigots. Decent people do not cheer for such a tribe of misfits. "Catholic edicts: Confessions on Saturday. Absolution on Sunday. At it again on Monday." - H. G. Wells

We often assume technological progress automatically leads to social progress. History tells a very different story. Technology only lifts everyone when institutions evolve alongside it and actively manage the transition.

Strong clarification because emotional intelligence is often misunderstood as “being nice” or emotionally soft. The most accurate point here is that EQ is fundamentally about regulation and awareness understanding your emotions without letting them control your decisions, communication, or leadership under pressure.

Who benefits is the real question.

Such a great breakdown of what EQ is

Jesus, Paulina Krukowska the Pope does not need to join LinkedIn! Let me remind you, for that matter, that Jesus only needed 12 followers.

Adrian Coman Better late than never

The dignity justification in the encyclical works for about 30% of the population. For the rest of the world, the non-Christian world, it is provincial. To address this, I propose we establish “the floor” of human dignity, based on shared biology of the species, a biology that predates all sectarian and secular traditions by about 300,000 years. My reaction is on my page for those interested.

Mila F. Luke Robert Mason it brought your attention ;) Love this comment!

Interesting point. External oversight matters, but I think the next challenge is what kind of working systems we build around AI itself. AI should optimize for what it does best: processing information and handling scale. Humans should be freed to do what humans do best: judgment, creativity, trust, and meaning. We have a unique opportunity right now to build systems where both operate in their strengths rather than creating environments where people slowly become operators inside an efficiency machine.

So true. People never wunder why they are pushing Ai. It's not for the greater good, only to get richer and powerfull for an elite bunch. So Ai isn't evil, the people who are pushing it are... To get more control on you, every day, go figure. So why help them succeed.