Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Pascal BORNET Your emphasis on 'who decides and benefits' is a powerful point. The real impact of AI hinges on intentional design and responsible governance, ensuring its advanced capabilities genuinely serve broader human outcomes.

Tamer Chowdhury thank you

the data loop one hits different when you're building something with real user-contributed data. that moat grows every single day and nobody can just copy it overnight

Day 6 is where most people quietly miss the real ROI. Going from 'I prompt Claude' to 'Claude runs my recurring workflows' is the inflection point — scheduled tasks plus connectors turn it from an assistant you visit into infrastructure that compounds in the background. Solid breakdown, especially the .md voice file on Day 3 — underrated step.

Imran Gul My comment was genuine but if you still want to learn then .. padh lo hamse..hamari fees bhi kisi se jyada ya kisi se kam hi hai...ham bhi mast padhate hai. .www.evolvance.solutions.

Liked for the shirt

Luís Rodrigues I think this has to start higher and has to go deeper. First AI is not equal AI. Anthropic and OpenAI don't share training data, prompts, weights and built in configuration. Anthrophic has 11 products that all have different limits and purposes. When using any of those everything starts with understanding the built in tools like read, webfetch. What you describe is a set of fancy over hyped key term. Behavioral patterns, known use cases. There dependencies. Guardrails, built in immutable prompts, those are the things that differentiate. An MCP an agent could be anything.. My skills in my workspace use API calls, run external judges, confirm semantically, review visually. Are those skills them agents? Can they overcome the char count limit of any built in tool?

As the Pope in his recent declaration said. We cannot leave AI in the hands of a few. Decision making what get's build needs to come from the society. Fortunately we have many young innovators, who now use AI to create impact. What amazes me most, when this happens in healthcare and we can treat deceases like cancer.

The more important question is who gets to decide where that power goes and who captures the value when it scales.

The strongest AI systems are not built from one powerful model alone, they come from how well reasoning, context, actions, and connectivity work together. Luís Rodrigues

Rob Anderson As long as AI is controlled by people who will do nearly anything for power or money it will not end well.

Todays big Tech, big Pharma, big Food and big Finance have already become more powerful than national democrations. Which means, when Trump visits China with Big Tech CEO´s, the question arises: who has more power? Democratic elective leaders or the Big Tech CEO´s who are responsible for the complete infrastructure on how we work and live. Given their already powerful position, it also raises questions about who controls a fair deployment of these technologies Pascal BORNET

Luís Rodrigues! It's good reminder that the value isn't in any single piece, but in how they/re wired together into one functioning system.

Rich Petersen I’m banking on it in the hands of the millions of Changemakers and it not being controlled by the power hungry might give us a chance. Time will tell!!

One of the strongest signs of high EQ is creating an environment where people feel heard, respected, and comfortable speaking openly. That kind of culture drives both performance and collaboration.

The most important decisions in AI are no longer about capability, they are about who controls deployment, distribution, and the value created when these systems scale. Pascal BORNET

The part about being a calming presence stands out because that’s usually what teams remember most during difficult periods. People with strong EQ tend to create better communication, fewer unnecessary conflicts, and more trust across teams.

Good analogy 👍. The data sampling and cleaning is an integral part too.

It’s worth reading section 150 of the encyclical (Vatican Website https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html) as he alludes to the precarity of digital labourers. This question of digital labour training AI, as a new type of “slavery”, is something that is less discussed in the media, but is central to the tradition of Catholic social teaching. A relatively recent political example is Mater et magistra by Pope John XXIII in 1961 who discussed the labour market, much to the annoyance of American Catholic conservatives like William F. Buckley at the time.

Work related noise damage can also have a negative effect on your mental health as in tinnitus and it’s overall health understanding, there is a need to have ongoing employement research for a full assessment towards its effects on dementia and other mental health illnesses in later life and into retirement.