Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I was laughing my ass off when Jordan Peterson tweeted all indignantly about Cha…
ytr_Ugx1mtgAt…
G
People losing your jobs.
Use AI to make money.
And repeat.
Y'all are forgetti…
ytc_UgwqzzAAK…
G
the part not being factored in is the currency devaluation. yes they are putting…
ytc_UgzA_lS8u…
G
The AI "learns" by stealing information actual humans made.
If there are no peo…
rdc_n5h9336
G
yes AI doesn't have a worldview, or beliefs, or the ability to reason like we ca…
ytc_Ugwf0e4y1…
G
rubbish to fool dumb people..... AI is just a huge database.... it does not th…
ytc_Ugzirxw9a…
G
...and there is much more. Our society is about to take a turn for the worst and…
ytc_UgzbU3HPS…
G
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:06 💡 *Humans differentiate between tas…
ytc_UgxM9A2cA…
Comment
I’ll throw in my own two cents as a ML student researcher, but I’d argue you offer an alternative instead of saying it’s not bad but no solution.
My take is that it does steal artists work. But rather than their entire piece, it’s their labor. In many cases, it takes artists years to develop skills, such as the correct brush stroke. While yes, artists get inspiration, the difference is when the work is your own. AI art uses other people’s skills (brush strokes, color choices, artistic styles) and replicates something else using those parameters in their model.
I think it would be better for everyone if there was a better way of acquiring training data, famous art pieces not owned by one individual but seen as societally shared (like a piece in a museum seen by all) or pieces which artists explicitly allow for AI to be trained on. This would make it much less controversial and could offer an opportunity for artists to use AI in their own works.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-22T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugwj5-JFnQBMy7_-gr54AaABAg.9jwoJAPi32n9jwoXUbC32U","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jxF_A903g1","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jzN3_8AOw3","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwjTZXPWc04e4VNVix4AaABAg.9jwP9aJdrRU9jxOhZExDCZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyRKFeec-szjWhVb6B4AaABAg.9jwO9Tz3zYf9k1f-cXf1GB","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxn9gTRDk5GhXwwWWR4AaABAg.9jwGOK8TTze9jwIdwih3iO","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9jvx_0_uzSB","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9k3UKhAVdzf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwmGtpLtwk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwnwHO4E1G","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]