Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The fault here was not in using ChatGPT, or any other automated tool. The fault …
ytc_UgzUivNEw…
G
The fact that AI Artists call themselves “Artists” is what baffles me the most 💀…
ytc_Ugy5pBDe8…
G
What I find strange is that Ray Kurtzweil who introduced us to the singularity, …
ytc_UgzQzBaTT…
G
AI is the new nuclear, it can control everything in the world In the future .…
ytc_UgxWncv7r…
G
Waymo and other self-driving cars are NOT coming to cities in my country *ANY* …
ytc_UgxlMTGzS…
G
If a deepFAKE of Palki Sharma ('What happened to Upadhyay?') were to be made, it…
ytc_UgwUMn7E1…
G
@msqway11Exactly. It seems that a thing has to possess subjectivity to be consc…
ytr_UgxRSMEyq…
G
I just don't like AI art cause when they screw up thr prompt it comes out so unn…
ytc_UgzaTl4wj…
Comment
@Wolta You’re leaning on two weak moves here. First, you’re treating “companion” as if it automatically means “human only,” but that’s never been true. The definition is simply “a person or animal with whom one spends time or travels.” Nobody questions calling a dog a companion. If animals qualify on the basis of presence and shared time, then excluding AI just because it’s not flesh is a double standard.
Second, “this isn’t the 1700s anymore” isn’t an argument — it’s just an appeal to modernity. Being newer doesn’t make your point true. If anything, the modern era has expanded companionship: therapy animals, online friendships, digital communities. AI companions are simply one more extension of that pattern.
So the real test is this: is companionship about what something is made of (biology vs. code), or what it does (providing presence, support, and interaction)? If it’s the latter — and our use of animals proves it is — then excluding AI isn’t logic. It’s just preference dressed up as principle.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-10-03T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgweAflsw4uIzPaCxzB4AaABAg.ALLCScO8QsjANpbuU6KTsd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzTNh61fpL7m5mxIvd4AaABAg.AL0kdBA8HcrAL27bQvjxN4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwx3uxh20QzPlD9sVh4AaABAg.ASXbdUikiX_AUBEBJQpdp5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzUyxeTBwOuJQ2DRh4AaABAg.AN_dKICJ1MrAUBDsdV3764","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGICXpr6zxxQT8BpN4AaABAg.AKBhcuyAwRJAME6Kgbbyus","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzkfNAa_ciwsc2iqIh4AaABAg.AHm94y9HMmsAMKogDyQ5wp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyWbvhpA0iDgh7sxVZ4AaABAg.AHLcbSBb1rfAJC9DHUhzcP","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyQH9pBxdSHlu6yGlp4AaABAg.AHLKyTd7wCFAKKWdNWdWqX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzJV5Q1h8I2U9qGZxp4AaABAg.AHCc0aFp9vkAIhwBjwNWTT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzlSUd1mAh6i9urcnN4AaABAg.AH4GyYK70h1ANfYdkEmPHn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]