Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We need to get our schools out of the industrial age and start them with coding …
ytc_UgwE48cGQ…
G
They should rename them the devil's fathers and the AI suicidal mission we are i…
ytc_Ugy5LcyjN…
G
Hope you are not an AI created follower😅. Anyway, if you are a human, congrats …
ytr_UgzXlCnSb…
G
Bill gates recently wrote about this on his blog. He envisions that all of those…
rdc_k9iet7a
G
I am sorry to break another doomsday scenario in this channel, which I still lov…
ytc_UgzQ4mY5Z…
G
I feel sorry for this family, but only children that are severely depressed comm…
ytc_UgzdZ2ihY…
G
According to Mark Zuckerberg, artificial intelligence software or even superinte…
ytc_UgxTy4k-b…
G
What about deepfakes? That should be one of the main focus of the AI Act.…
ytc_Ugz-CS2ya…
Comment
@Wolta You’re leaning on two weak moves here. First, you’re treating “companion” as if it automatically means “human only,” but that’s never been true. The definition is simply “a person or animal with whom one spends time or travels.” Nobody questions calling a dog a companion. If animals qualify on the basis of presence and shared time, then excluding AI just because it’s not flesh is a double standard.
Second, “this isn’t the 1700s anymore” isn’t an argument — it’s just an appeal to modernity. Being newer doesn’t make your point true. If anything, the modern era has expanded companionship: therapy animals, online friendships, digital communities. AI companions are simply one more extension of that pattern.
So the real test is this: is companionship about what something is made of (biology vs. code), or what it does (providing presence, support, and interaction)? If it’s the latter — and our use of animals proves it is — then excluding AI isn’t logic. It’s just preference dressed up as principle.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-10-03T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgweAflsw4uIzPaCxzB4AaABAg.ALLCScO8QsjANpbuU6KTsd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzTNh61fpL7m5mxIvd4AaABAg.AL0kdBA8HcrAL27bQvjxN4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwx3uxh20QzPlD9sVh4AaABAg.ASXbdUikiX_AUBEBJQpdp5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzUyxeTBwOuJQ2DRh4AaABAg.AN_dKICJ1MrAUBDsdV3764","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGICXpr6zxxQT8BpN4AaABAg.AKBhcuyAwRJAME6Kgbbyus","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzkfNAa_ciwsc2iqIh4AaABAg.AHm94y9HMmsAMKogDyQ5wp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyWbvhpA0iDgh7sxVZ4AaABAg.AHLcbSBb1rfAJC9DHUhzcP","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyQH9pBxdSHlu6yGlp4AaABAg.AHLKyTd7wCFAKKWdNWdWqX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzJV5Q1h8I2U9qGZxp4AaABAg.AHCc0aFp9vkAIhwBjwNWTT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzlSUd1mAh6i9urcnN4AaABAg.AH4GyYK70h1ANfYdkEmPHn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]