Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The CGI looks great but when guy hands over the hat, he's about 2 meters away fr…
ytc_UgyDREoVO…
G
Wow, the points about AI detectors just analyzing patterns are spot on! AICarma’…
ytc_Ugy0MnG7t…
G
A.i cgi is getting good.. this one didnt even flicker..
Come on guys.. hydrolic…
ytc_UgzFvmvhh…
G
AI can’t even reliably tell you how many “r”s there are in “strawberry”
The onl…
rdc_oh2ffir
G
I genuinely believe Disney could sue me for my literal pants I'm wearing and win…
ytc_UgzoLw_Qj…
G
I have blue eyes so I know I've got Neanderthal ancestry. My theory is that ETs …
ytr_UgyjkoQiU…
G
IMO the AMPTP should make a new offer to the WGA. Half their current pay. NOTHIN…
ytc_UgxxxC2V3…
G
You can have an AI anchor that reads the prompts, its not some jobs its most job…
ytc_UgybtxctX…
Comment
The problem was not the RADAR but the AI. The RADAR would have picked her up (had the RADAR failed the AI would not have continued to operate the car). The AI is trained BY EXPERIENCE to predict what things mean. ALL of the AI experience would have been based on cars that had VISIBLE headlights while driving at night. THIS car was being operated at night with headlights adjusted so low that, while technically visible, any pedestrian would have inevitably have misinterpreted them as being much farther away than they actually are because all of the pedestrian's experience would also have been based on experience with cars at night not having headlights below a minimum threshold level and THIS car had a level far above it.
THE CORE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE HEADLIGHT ILLUMINATION WAS FAR BELOW THE MINIMUM LEVEL IN >BOTH< THE AI'S AND THE PEDESTRIAN'S EXPERIENCE CAUSING >BOTH< THE AI >AND< THE PEDESTRIAN TO FATALLY MISINTERPRET WHAT WAS GOING ON.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-04-22T15:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwaQzmgK_KKkiwOp-t4AaABAg.8ukQcDbbQIH8yPg9b_4PW-","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwESeYnecaolpcJ2X94AaABAg.8e66p0j8Dfg8e6J7Ck2xYv","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwESeYnecaolpcJ2X94AaABAg.8e66p0j8Dfg8fLfUgCb06b","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxI1mfWYxQO_RzH72p4AaABAg.8e7f_Y4Iem98hAicM1w8lK","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzDtP4UH_xyWG2f-E14AaABAg.8e933x6Pdsh8eFB_Sk3_Ol","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}
]