Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Just wait till Putin, Xi, Trump, Musk and other psycho guys start using it again… ytc_UgxZa9zpX… G Whatever you do, don't talk to the character ai ai, Minori Shido, you will regre… ytc_Ugwd3d8P9… G i play character ai, ik it has art generation crap on it... but is it bad like e… ytc_UgzN5BMes… G I mean, they pay 300k for mid level bruh. I'd hate to work for meta but in this … rdc_ohvpx2c G There once was an idol called AI, shining so bright, We dreamed it would turn ev… ytc_Ugy6VJPQ8… G talking about ethics and morals in todays society that totally gives a crap abou… ytc_UgwyPzq_4… G Why do you hate them so much and also are they Ai or someone controlling them i… ytc_Ugx8xIFHe… G I get where you're coming from! Sophia's responses might seem straightforward, b… ytr_UgwSETdkO…
Comment
What I find surprisingly lacking in discussions like these is proper representation of social sciences in the panel, be it sociologists, historians, political scientists (etc). If the goal is to talk about AI and technology's impact on our future, and therefore by definition about societies, cultures, people, locally and globally, then I'd expect to see some experts of such fields included into the discussion, because that is their field of expertise, unlike with non-social science experts. It'd be wise to include some computational/IT experts to benefit from their expertise into understanding the technology itself (however so often they seem lacking and ill-advised when it comes to social matters and the technology's impact on peoples and their societies), but it seems wild, nonsensical if not sometimes cynical to me that the other way around social scientists are so very often categorically and systemically excluded on matters that relate to THEIR fields of expertise, while non-experts often talk so confidently on social matters they don't actually have much expertise in.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-05T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningcontractualist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwZyB8kadifiA5VOKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyuXF-ZWdfxIGTZpqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxaIa4fEwEzdI2s9zd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx43kDpw1e7XXqgyMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzj9PJuBEeifooeqFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrdosCanqs7tT0YON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy1gpYcngcXLWCMFP94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwxtRtaQzrEzEbkwAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzBCZUWleatLTwB9HN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwtpYsUBVrfpiZnz8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]