Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Made the shift to DDG a few weeks back. Google's push of AI convinced me. I've n… rdc_n3y608i G Is B-Max from Big Hero 6 a robot considered as a human ? Or have any rights ?… ytc_UggaLH0Jy… G Agricultural machines didn’t replace farmers, they made it so you need far less … ytc_Ugzdvoe9w… G I'm not sure what to believe but one part that stuck with me is when the enginee… rdc_ichgccl G AI is made from the brain of man He puts wire's and batteries together making c… ytc_UgwoJte15… G More artists needs to learn how to poison their arts, the downfall of ai would c… ytc_UgymRZyNf… G ​@InkwellIts a very small con and i think they try to get anyone they can as a g… ytr_UgziywDnl… G Theres is a good ai beeing trained by scientist right now, and it'll be useful f… ytc_UgwLn4k67…
Comment
What I find surprisingly lacking in discussions like these is proper representation of social sciences in the panel, be it sociologists, historians, political scientists (etc). If the goal is to talk about AI and technology's impact on our future, and therefore by definition about societies, cultures, people, locally and globally, then I'd expect to see some experts of such fields included into the discussion, because that is their field of expertise, unlike with non-social science experts. It'd be wise to include some computational/IT experts to benefit from their expertise into understanding the technology itself (however so often they seem lacking and ill-advised when it comes to social matters and the technology's impact on peoples and their societies), but it seems wild, nonsensical if not sometimes cynical to me that the other way around social scientists are so very often categorically and systemically excluded on matters that relate to THEIR fields of expertise, while non-experts often talk so confidently on social matters they don't actually have much expertise in.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-05T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningcontractualist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwZyB8kadifiA5VOKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyuXF-ZWdfxIGTZpqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxaIa4fEwEzdI2s9zd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx43kDpw1e7XXqgyMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzj9PJuBEeifooeqFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrdosCanqs7tT0YON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy1gpYcngcXLWCMFP94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwxtRtaQzrEzEbkwAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzBCZUWleatLTwB9HN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwtpYsUBVrfpiZnz8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]