Raw LLM Responses

I hate "IA art," aka plagiarized slop, and I also think Shad is a huge R-E-T-A-R-D. However, the stereotype that only mediocre, woke artists are scared of it still rings true, I actually liked that you explained how the images are generated rather than dismissing it as tech mumbo jumbo beyond sensitive artists bc "true art is made by fee-fees" like most Anti-AI artists that turn their videos into a inspirational gobbledygook about the importance of making art rather than learning what gives value to art, bc no, your crude furry p0rn scribbles doesn't have the same artistic value as the Mona Lisa and it'll never will, but then by half of the video you keep using the same appeal to emotion and it's annoying. Then, you bring up another certified 5et@rd using genetic anomalies to justify the Tumblr infinite gender spectrum, aka a fallacy of the exception, newsflash, people who SUFFER from those conditions are either male or female in the end of the day, most of them being sterile, along with a bunch of other not-so-nice side effects. It's so nice that people use horrible congenital disorders to justify stupid, petty internet sh1t. People with Down syndrome have an extra chromosome, but we don't treat them as another variation of the Homo Sapiens. Also, what the fVck that was to do with the topic? Make Shad look evil by having a total valid point? That's why more and more people is siding with "AI art" crowd, being overly whinny and self-righteous will not help, and let's be real, most of the artists against AI are rather mediocre and produce art of little to no value anyway and for sure aren't "sacrificing their life for the art", it's the "Harry Cooper effect", it doesn't matter how much you are right about something, if you're a raging @sshole about it, most people that would help you otherwise, will reject your ideas out of spite.