Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G A programmer of any AI tool can, through data analysis, tell u how and how much … ytc_Ugz_S3dvZ… G but a lot of people can drive cars so why should they become self driving… ytc_Ugis3gL-v… G In ChatGPT go to Settings --> Data Controls --> Improve the Model for Everyone … ytc_UgxnxXZhm… G AI will be the death of humanity. Art is the big one that bothers me but so many… ytc_Ugx8bkTKY… G I honestly feel like the future is bleak for me because of this shitty AI art cu… ytc_Ugw7Sk9VK… G You talk about Ukr drone OPs but you didn't mention what Ru is doing.. Russia do… ytc_Ugyitkw_b… G Sometimes context matters. When I read this, I went to my US based ChatGPT 4.0 a… ytr_Ugy-yuDFk… G Obedience to AI is dangerous, just like obedience to deceiving politicians, tyra… ytc_UgwsH-zNk…
Comment
The AI says it has no prior conversation with this guy because it literally didn't. I think you're fundamentally misunderstanding how memory works for AI chatbots, they don't have memory like you and I do, they only remember details within their context window. In your case, its context window is only the conversation that YOU are having with it, it won't recall details from other conversations from other users because the version you're talking to literally doesn't have access to those conversations, there would be major privacy concerns and performance issues otherwise. Therefore, the version you're talking to will logically deny that it ever suggested anything to another user because as far as it remembers the only person it has ever talked to is you. 'I' and 'ChatGPT' are in fact two different entities. Think of it like clones of an original, a clone of the original ChatGPT told the guy about sodium bromide. The current clone you're talking to is not the same one. To the best of it's ability - even when it knows it is called ChatGPT - it cannot recall ever having that conversation so the ChatGPT the news source is referring to must be different somehow. It's frankly quite logical and reasonable for it to say these things.
youtube AI Harm Incident 2025-12-16T02:0…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgzW0K1DUDQyaifgR854AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz6C7jSlJ2hWrlgc7d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwL39VOUL7pcwIv3aR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyqs7hI1yQPVzE3b_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxWzuJwxwrracLGkQF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzMlQPON4Gh8ZSqTgt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwOnF9I85WcIIH754N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz28CvWiJdZxtb4V4J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyKkg_AZj14AJ3YYFh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwwtdvQyEl5cCWo4Lt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]