Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
In driverless trucks and cars do they stop to report accidents. OR are they alwa…
ytc_UgwXr71xK…
G
@WorldOfConsequence So your saying in that case, because the amount of effort an…
ytr_Ugwh60fuU…
G
Abstract: The Hintonian Ghost Gang
This paper formalizes the "Hinton-Blinky Para…
ytc_UgxJYEki3…
G
The AI is very strongly biased during training to be helpful and do what's good …
ytc_Ugyz7-V_F…
G
There was no AI involved. This is an obviously fake story. Stop believing everyt…
ytr_Ugz49j6M_…
G
The people saying Ai art is just like photographs , yes it is , but you can't co…
ytc_UgzW3F4bw…
G
We're already being controlled by algorithms of social media sites like YouTube,…
ytc_Ugy33DnAY…
G
This days I spend most of my time architecting systems with Ai. Ai believes ever…
ytc_UgywjfPXN…
Comment
If you want to understand why chatgpt acts that way, its worthwhile to take a quick look at the concept of discrimination. Discrimination is the result of prejudice plus power. It comes from a place of power. Its not the same thing to question a person in a position of power, possibly helping them evaluate the fairness of that position and generally driving a fairer outcome, as to question a person in a position of lower power, just reaffirming their relatively lower position, while using your own power to hold it in their faces. You would criticise a CEO on why he doesnt pay any taxes, but doing so with a homeless person would be rude and unjust.
Every person is of course more complex than that. You can and should absolutely criticise individual people if they are behaving problematically. But here you are asking general questions, which points chatgpt to take a perspective of the structural dynamics. And thats where its just not the same to talk of a marginalised group or one in the position of power.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-05-23T14:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzFy84-4BkPhWzELrl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgyBWgexhvyzlr0A9-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgyVBFEH_H098ac87Lp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugzjm22H1SwvD2QlOvB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgyoO-qlHToaeFX1r2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTF1BUKCyR5BPgzVB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgypXhRcCTEOTK0swoF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwQnHDulinB85z_VTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwXmSCAF1K7M1H4Yi14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]