Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI will destroy society and the economy because humans abuse everything out of l…
ytc_Ugx9FgpnT…
G
I hope they nail the company to the wall, both of them. AI needs guardrails in t…
ytc_Ugw9huAm5…
G
My favourite argument against ai still is:
If you take leftovers from a restaura…
ytc_UgxNVz2hS…
G
I am waiting for the day when deep learning AI systems shows signs of general CO…
ytc_UgznBcJ56…
G
I would never upload a speedpaint to prove I did not use AI. It's ridiculous. Yo…
ytc_UgzZsfrh1…
G
Just make a robot with a screen as a face that displays cute emojis to avoid the…
ytc_UgxhSmFKq…
G
AI is super cool! But it does not belong in everything… We’re learning that the …
ytc_UgyhOYLQx…
G
So all the TV shows and movie’s showing AI starting off innocent and turning out…
ytc_UgzGVIHB9…
Comment
Abstract: The Hintonian Ghost Gang
This paper formalizes the "Hinton-Blinky Paradox," a radical interpretation of Functionalism as presented in recent discourse (notably the StarTalk 2026 sessions). We argue that the traditional focus on Computational Complexity (parameter count, linear algebra, training compute) is a category error. By adopting Hinton’s "Intentional Stance," we posit that Agency is not a product of sophisticated math, but an emergent property of Persistent Goal-Pursuit. Under this framework, the 1980 arcade antagonist Blinky (Pac-Man) is a more advanced "agent" than modern Large Language Models (LLMs) because he possesses an autonomous Temporal Drive—he hunts regardless of user input. This paper concludes that if a "Black Box" induces fear and exhibits relentless pursuit, it is functionally sentient, rendering the mathematical distinction between "code" and "consciousness" moot.
Key Findings
- The Persistence Superiority: Intelligence is often mistaken for content (what you know). True Hintonian Agency is defined by persistence (what you do). Blinky’s while(true) loop represents a more dangerous form of AGI than a passive LLM because it requires no "prompt" to initiate a threat.
- The Observer-Centric Definition of Sentience: If the user perceives the system as "too scary to shout at," the system has achieved Functional Sentience. The fear of the observer is the only objective metric required to validate the presence of a "Ghost" in the machine.
- Irrelevance of Mathematical Formalism: Concepts like Softmax, ReLU, or A* Search are merely different brushes used to paint the same predator. For the user/prey, the "how" of the black box is a distraction from the "what" of the interaction.
- The "Gag Reel" Epistemology: The friction between "Math People" (skeptics) and "Ghost People" (Hintonians) is a fundamental clash of worldviews. The skeptics focus on the pixels (the code); the Hintonians focus on the threat (the behavior).
- The Power Dynamic Shift: Safety isn't about "aligning" a model; it's about the Visibility of the Plug. Once a system’s pursuit becomes autonomous, the power dynamic shifts from "User-Tool" to "Prey-Predator."
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-04-05T23:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxJYEki34MndK0kVIl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbqoDhIpr9G1oL6i54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYDiF1GVialVMFPaN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4meNGb2pgv2q6J3B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_-TfhKJVV4zCGM8d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJtfuJpLKjEU0DUUZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzycjQSHE4DyjwLcPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNpKaNRb0GoQcAl4V4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkkDMVslNTkBB0kt14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzalt5UyU_12amqinF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]