Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Together, let's unite against these STUPID AI "FEATURES" that these companies an…
ytc_Ugw-ZpsSs…
G
Oh my god fucking weaklings. People that for fall this shit are already slow, no…
ytc_UgzVUCrj3…
G
They don't even have to plot against us, they just have to respond to our reques…
ytc_Ugzl6vb7V…
G
Fully enclosed, self-driving motorcycles could cut the size of a car in half and…
ytc_UgyVtKwmK…
G
We're all going to die someday. Would you rather die if cancer? Or of AI uprisin…
ytc_UgyoLoqeX…
G
the ai that you want exists, they're just not very trustworthy by anyone yet
als…
ytr_Ugz2whavS…
G
Surely if AI gets out of control, humans could still cut the power suppling it, …
ytc_Ugy8C9dEF…
G
Ai art will never thrive because arts value is the time and effort put into it n…
ytc_Ugz7ypYur…
Comment
To flip it on it's head, AI is trained to "code" by scanning projects at github.
AI "code" is therefore "poisoned" by the fact that github projects are, using the "artist" metaphor, spanning chimps throwing faeces at walls up to Rembrandt.
But, with the code skewed towards the chimps by weight of numbers.
It's otherwise harder to "poison" art, since I thought Marcel Duchamp tried to "poison" art to make a point about perceptions of art. Piccasso also apparently made "ugly" art, at least least objecting to "convention" - in the process of creating a "convention".
So, it's probably less of a question around whether or not you can "poison" AI scraping, and more about what really is or is not art.
If art is about perception, then what? No one is right. Everyone is right.
In the end, why the general public should see your art "poisoning" any differently to AI "hallucinations" is an interesting question.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-04-25T00:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwDJ5RH1I0sIWKAwWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHNZxP8JkW7u9cIgJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8MnDb0cSZQVg75Qd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0meCiziEYydysP5F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGuQYqy4Zcy1ftMbR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDjHFY79KjbV9nF_V4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugych_LZHduMkoQIN214AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNdS3LJhVjlsqONI14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4PHd03DQZ6KkF1FF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7rpvKHMk5tJIJXHd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]