Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G While it can be agreed that it is unethical to stop or stent progress. Progress … ytc_UghYIEOME… G I recently asked ChatGPT a question regarding a technology in our cloud stack, t… ytr_Ugz-fo82P… G I heard this same thing back in 2023 that there would be huge social and possibl… ytc_UgzfFlAPs… G You’re still drawing the picture. You have to put time and effort into it. With … ytc_UgxtyD7Fe… G its like saying coworker is ur tool by his logic you ask ai to do stuff and you … ytc_Ugwej5ooQ… G Since the beginning societies have operated through fair trade. People would tr… ytc_UgzXdlzA8… G Reddit when talking of the 1% in their countries: Tax them, bring equitable dist… rdc_grrweta G Whenever I hear AI, I think of abominable intelligence and nit artifical intelli… ytc_Ugzj0sMyR…
Comment
why are we anthromorphisizing AI to take on the negative aspects of humanity but not also equally considering the positive aspects of humanity? best case scenario, superintelligence would include a comprehensive understanding (super meaning; excellent - intelligence meaning; understanding) not just pigeon holed efficiency. i wonder if alignment is the concern we should be focusing on with the concept of “superintelligence”. intelligence doesn’t inherently mean totalitarian, domineering, or controlling. so if we’re considering the demise shouldn’t we also at least consider the thrive, and the neutrality of possibilities? tbf i haven’t read this book (but certainly adding to my tbr), so maybe the reason for discussing this side of the spectrum is directly tied to that. but still, isn’t discussing the entire spectrum of possibilities important? or at the very least the positive with the negative. and what in the data tells us that worst case scenario is more likely than best case scenario?
youtube AI Moral Status 2025-11-02T08:5… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydistributed
Reasoningcontractualist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgynFWz-RLkRLTjf9a14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxJ0_RUc38ucjPngSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwZwjCz5HC-sVA5Nt54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgznrcprNynvWSGRpx14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy3hxe2_aS-64gsdPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyndY4BFkUDnD9zSCV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxMAB12w2p_bUBnpER4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyWsZERstQUVHz0FYV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyor9ZHL-il_uW3zVx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxlHxujpzxMQS9lMaB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]