Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G When my kids are a bit older I will retrain from law to midwifery. I am 100 % re… ytc_UgwiuG9R5… G Yeaaaaah - we are all dead by 2030. I’m going to enjoy my next few holidays.… ytc_UgzxQCDMl… G Geo blocked? Just use a vpn. About AI as weapons, that is a really really bad id… ytc_UgzDPEKrb… G Every pro-AI art argument always boils down to the same thing: “I’m not immediat… ytc_UgzGGaTaF… G you sound dumb asf franco. taking inspiration from a reference is not the same a… ytr_Ugy3XkTKM… G @someonesgoat it's not intelligence though. Only this new buzz which is tantamo… ytr_Ugxkn_1UZ… G For real, all these people here being like "CEO's are super important actually b… rdc_jsy7l8e G There is literally no scenario where ai works to humanity's benefit. Just like … rdc_m79wdn9

Comment

I don't agree necessarily with how Mergrethe has characterised the 'existential' risks, as she's made it more about inconvenience and inappropriateness of the decision-making. If the software operates in a medical sense and isn't able to extrapolate suitable treatments based upon your sex, then it's not good software and shouldn't have been deployed. If the software is picking and choosing who can have a mortgage despite affordability criteria being met, then it's not in a deployable state. All things being equal, if you don't get a mortgage then there will be other factors outside of affordability. The bigger problem is much smaller: If the AI is better at our jobs than us, what reason will employers have to retain staff who do a mediocre job and cost a lot of money over an AI system that does the job of an office for a fraction of the cost? Literally none. And there's nothing wrong in that idea as we have been replacing people with machines for a very long time. That's the problem, and she hasn't addressed the need for Human-AI competition laws to recognise how much we will need to compete with AI to certify ourselves as valuable.

youtube AI Governance 2024-05-24T07:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxlXsEy-Wbbv8z0e7d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3KqTxpJWU6jzzA2l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy93gzrB7HF4T172id4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyLUlEt2cfeh4WgjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwYjdrcEzFkaHNj-1B4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw_B9ZgQoyFtLKkJfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwhp5CF0JxU_0MOmpZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2GUsHK1SSKTO8JMB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxlTd2oFU2oiR5eNl14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTprMMFMJyQ9dx9jh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses