Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Open AI saw how much money the cable tv and internet providers made off of what … ytc_UgwVvyolR… G A lot of people saying firing people is backfiring, accompanied by the 'AI is ga… ytc_UgylU0d8W… G I'm calling BS. There's other videos of her with the little round blue ring on t… ytc_Ugy0RfXBZ… G teachers and schools ,collage ,all will go as AI can teach ,analyze it's pupils… ytc_UgzOEgg0z… G It’s literally not better tho, no matter how good AI gets it will always be an i… ytr_UgzdU94QD… G Your claim that LLM is not true ai and that it does not have the capacity for re… ytr_Ugzr_UUyb… G Well if you have to keep your hands on the wheel it's not self driving. I have t… ytc_UgzZ-0lUF… G If most jobs are replaced, who are gonna pay for the services ? If ordnary peopl… ytc_UgyZ46gM-…
Comment
Look from different perspective: as someone who creates AI and from professional standpoint is really impressed by those models I feel like slowing their development by limiting access to data might not be the best way. Instead I'll aim more into limiting access to AI (paid access maybe or slower, moderated output) and post-creation governance of the pictures. So something like searching the internet for similarities to generated pictures (using AI!) and not outputting them if similarity is more than some threshold (let's say 70-80%) to existing artwork. Or simply making it impossible to input any artist name (except those who aren't affected negatively, so dead for many years or volunteering) in a prompt. Right to opt out of using their work as samples (tic on a profile recognizable by scrappers is a good idea) seems like no brainer thing that should be implemented right away, but defaulting to asking permission will slow down AI image HUGELY and might hurt its own evolution into something more independent. Thank you for attending my Ted talk.
youtube 2023-02-08T10:2… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydeveloper
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyregulate
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugw4ABbMSAh5gy-8hNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxQLpHUcgB46IDwQLh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz2yUHwMhrWfcRlliV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyXmpSwD9JMlE-2xHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyO01wOsaPYlswJ7eR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwAeEg9F1gI42Bx9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwMU1uQExm2y4VNAhl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx8eAuIdyEZ_cEptal4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzELyhmHP44SMcK6n54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxZgSb-Gyf-rgH6jFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"} ]