Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@dbt7778 We don't have to listen to new songs every week. We can listen to the o…
ytr_UgyqOx2vP…
G
On the topic of emotions: an AI responding faster does not make the argument tha…
ytc_Ugw0uKxAz…
G
Ai one look better than half of these tbh. But yeah ai is bad go hug yourself fo…
ytc_UgzvGscqH…
G
I really think a lot of the people mocking others for finding comfort or connect…
rdc_n7u5mac
G
The thing is nobody asked those artists if they could used their work before usi…
ytc_UgyutL1R0…
G
It sounds like you're referencing some deep insights there! While our video focu…
ytr_Ugy_7gflW…
G
The only entities on the planet that can create AI and that inform its base of m…
ytc_UgwiZ_5H4…
G
It's only a matter of time. The technology is already there as we speak. Combini…
ytc_UgxiURCiK…
Comment
The problem even with Opus 4.6 is that 1) it doesn't give an f about convetions (unless explicitly explained), and 2) it never refactors. Both of these lead to the codebase getting more and more and more entangled over time, and ultimately, the LLM cant keep up with all of the hacks it has created, cracks begin to appear and, because the control flow and execution paths are so overly complex, there's no really easy way out except rewriting the whole thing from scratch. And I'm in no way saying that this is a bad process (software development would be iterative anyway, with LLMs or not). But I'm saying that there's simply no way to get rid of the human developer just yet. Except if you're developing something trivial, like a todo app or a simple flight simulator that no-one will ever play.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-08T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxyTDzUWxd-iuB8RlV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzJVQ3LXdxwSOeAAB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsVLZCEsuftd1bOSN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8HqC9MjFBs0Wz5lF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFHzsdu0J1uxNv7Vh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJNlghgFdOBHTFcdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3qiOmab-UcwxR4lR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJvCF8me8wOVNoAZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq3uw8erjOwOyconZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"frustration"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4XNlFd5depzlP0i94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]