Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
A.I could potentially eliminate humanity from the face of the earth. In this poi…
ytc_UgyRXTa1J…
G
Anybody still wondering why the EU lacks any innovative companies?
This AI Act …
ytc_UgzyVD_pn…
G
Imagine being jealous that an ai draws better than you so you mock it alongside …
ytc_Ugwqsk7kA…
G
@cholovekno_ne_pauk propaganda, fake videos of real people, fake nsfw of real pe…
ytr_UgwVbDbBT…
G
DONT ALLOW AI COMPANIES TO BE FOR PROFIT!!!!! It has to ALL be open to the publi…
ytc_Ugyhb2TKX…
G
I often think about One Punch Man when there is this debate about AI. A first th…
ytc_UgxLJA9FR…
G
It’s not going to happen. This is still the realm of science fiction and, even i…
ytc_UgzGGq2mZ…
G
On AI Safety. Steven, sir, your question is poignant: "Superintelligence is alre…
ytc_Ugyg_81S1…
Comment
Mike said here exactly what I've been saying these past few months - if the current bulk of writers are worried about AI taking their jobs, it's clear that the output of these writers is reasonably replaceable by AI, regardless of the nascent state of the AI in question doing the replacing. I'm a software programmer and machine learning was part of my curriculum for my bachelor's in computer science, so I know a bit about how the sausage is made. It's one thing to use AI as an auxiliary tool to help writing if the overwhelming majority of the creative portion of the writing is done by a human, but as a recent Valliant Renegade video showed it's clear that writers think AI is good enough to start doing more of the writing _and_ studios think AI is nearly good enough to start replacing a number of humans in the writing room. Can't say current AI deepfaking is good enough to outright replace humans on the acting side yet, though, but that might be more a "resource budget" issue than an "actor's performance" issue at this point.
youtube
AI Jobs
2023-08-30T04:5…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugy5R7z9GeRDWiKTUi54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzic3KCxJMkq0mv-bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw5hywbBBFIDEWpLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbS6wuGIIl4012pA94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7zpX61MCaRzxhCB54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcpHCNfnH_N7AoXSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})