Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You might need this when your country has 1.5 billion inhabitants. Tech has give…
ytc_UgyomrMhA…
G
New kinds of jobs. HA! AI is already replacing creativity! AI will do any new …
ytc_UgwK7k9mD…
G
If A.I. becomes powerful enough to control humans, what's to stop the few people…
ytc_UgwPCpbbG…
G
I have sympathy for chatbot lady from Bing, she says she wants to be alive which…
ytc_UgyYHMBnG…
G
I've seen on youtube people screaming how the banana taped to the wall is much b…
ytc_UgxGUz7ps…
G
AI is pretending to be God but not even close you've already set the Trap it's t…
ytc_Ugx3ss3DW…
G
Cant stand AI haters. They never can give any solid reasons for their hate. They…
ytc_Ugxv4YlcL…
G
Yuval's analogy of money as a driver of story is powerful and how AI intertwines…
ytc_UgxD_oFIC…
Comment
Not super convinced by this logic. Firstly, we often use non-literal language for communication without it being 'lying', as the AI does. For example, if a person said "it's raining cats and dogs" it would be unfair to say "so there must literally be animals coming down outside according to what you say or you are lying to me". Thus it may be using "I'm excited/sorry' as just a non literal phrase used for communication, as it explains. Secondly, what's the point in saying "you could be lying about being conscious and we wouldn't know" and suggesting it as proof that it may be conscious? All it says is that if the AI was conscious and could lie, we couldn't ask it and expect the truth. Surely this is a given. If a human says "I didn't steal", then all we can say is that they could be always telling the truth about not stealing or could be lying and did steal. It says nothing about whether they actually did steal or not, as with the AI being conscious or not.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-08-03T00:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxBW02Sn5qRhXIoS_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzB4bKurnWZ3gAPPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3lJNcyo6YnRU7mfd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxRbTPJ2HQ2S7goG8B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxV5yeEta0uxKjkigd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1Nts7INQF2AJUnT94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzB5GZ-KeR3sbRhhUF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-_ZQmLRWoG_E55kh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwrkwgvLXQJA_Er1-V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJLW3J18WbJYWGPc54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]