Raw LLM Responses

Derivation traces resemble reasoning in syntax only. Stop anthropomorphizing intermediate tokens as reasoning/thinking traces. Ai is complete bullshit. It is an inferential vector map generator, onto which humans have a nasty habit of imparting real meaning. To the ai, it is just a string of closely related numbers, not the result of some logical process. There is no potential for actual internal self-correction or validation because it is just a string of numbers that have been correlated by proximity vectors. You are going to entrust global security or economic policy to that? You expect scientific innovation to come from that? That’s ridiculous and dangerous. Trust such results at your own risk. The danger of ai is that it is coherent only within its own vector-mapping and any resemblance to something we recognize as real or correct is fundamentally arbitrary. It resembles our logic because it is mapped with our information. If a child behaved the way an ai does, you would become worried they were just guessing and couldn’t actually read. If “ai” were consequentially deployed, it will wind up doing something completely crazy from our perspective but still remain completely consistent within the context of its own tolkenized vector-mapping. It is not thinking, intelligent, or conscious. I’m a bit disgusted by the twists and turns in your various ai videos. Go back to basics and learn about what’s really going on here, or stop commenting on it.