Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I think there is debate to be had around what level of AI involvement does it be… ytc_Ugx8UaOyP… G just think 20 years from now the world will be destroyed because he said destroy… ytc_Ugh5F38Pc… G Bow to your AI Tech Lourdes in your government safety that you all beg for… ytc_UgzZ-3FHE… G Hey Neil... Don't forget about Kary Mullis who took LSD and unlocked the key to … ytc_UgxMZfOhj… G I literally shovel poop for a living… It seems to me that once AI takes over (an… ytc_Ugyb9DF8U… G ai is bad? yes but school also made it so students think that learning doesnt ma… ytc_Ugyx48uoz… G AI is better than human in many many factors if you believe in spirituals If not… ytc_UgxZFpHAd… G China will win this race and humanity will lose. Everyone for Ai and a robot fut… ytc_Ugx7IKaaD…
Comment
Regulations sound good in theory, but the authors of this video overlook one crucial point: a lot of today’s AI regulation is written by people who don’t actually understand the technology, and that kind of intervention tends to stall growth rather than guide it. In areas like AI-driven hiring, the market will inevitably self-correct anyway. Employers will eventually realise that AI-filtered candidates are often just people who are good at gaming AI systems, not necessarily people who are good at the job. If we don’t fully understand how AI works, how can we design regulations that genuinely solve the issues? My concern is that places like California may end up regulating so aggressively that the development simply moves elsewhere — not necessarily to China, just to any region that chooses a lighter approach. I’m not saying AI should be left completely unregulated, but assuming that regulation automatically fixes problems is naïve.
youtube 2025-12-04T07:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgyQEeKcGWLFTvEZWXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzfWJUolcpM82SA5QB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwkqB3QWHHqBE8diHF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyvby1s8IZT3Q1L_Gh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzoDg-VihVSAoPl7814AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyCNL4V4kZLTyfADsN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwCEbQdNoJJIGulU0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyt5S_WePTUAbbuNO14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyVrSvXpH69ofDySfV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwQVlI_JDbDQZlNpK94AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]