Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G While you're on the media circuit, how about you acknowledge and condemn the US … ytc_UgwbtN9zO… G I really don't understand how some people think that prompting AI to make art ma… ytc_Ugy4m0Kh_… G I want to know if you converted ChatGPT!!! Someone who watched the whole thing p… ytc_Ugxh5rgOu… G Just wanna say that while I understand that AI can be beneficial for humans...hu… rdc_nta62ny G This might be the first robot to have a wet dream and explain it to the public..… ytc_UgyIaAm6_… G The LIDAR definitely see the pedestrian, the pedestrian is moving towards the ca… ytc_Ugy1QL1_y… G My step-dad was always trying to just ai generate art when I was learning to dra… ytc_UgyyVEVBn… G I don’t think the average citizen is informed enough about data management and b… rdc_oi0xzfp
Comment
we can also have some positive things with respect to security from AI if we actually bother to try. I asked ChatGPT to generate a simple web server in C for me and it made one riddled with vulnerabilities. but then I asked it to check for security vulnerabilities and it found basically all that I found as well as a few that I missed. (one of the bugs it said “could potentially be an issue in more complex scenarios”, while it was already an issue here) then I asked it to translate the code to Rust, which it did successfully. that didn’t fix any vulnerabilities (except the buffer overflows that it had already fixed after the first querying), but it’s always nice to have a rust version anyways, what i’m trying to say is that we should have a security copilot that works as an extra pair of (robot) eyes on the code rather than (just) the current anti-security copilot that reduces the number of eyes on the code. there are many kinds of vulnerabilities that AI would be bad at spotting, but a vast majority of vulnerabilities are trivial ones that anyone could spot if they bothered to look for them
youtube 2024-08-04T08:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionunclear
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzzQkykOPl3MEdZyod4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxeykeHqnCUYgbhnN14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw2gEiHv-8hDsbikk54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxUHt6JU95oh-JciEJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwXUy_SKGt8GLb-SBd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxmhG4Cb6SVOMcQvd94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgysfQOMSiehxEfpCnx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugxx-N8OIfLfLHizn494AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyMfS_Tye09sN3vojp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyXUcxjoFyeqmxACHJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})