Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@triton62674
My guess is that those articles are either AI generated and don't…
ytr_UgziEm31e…
G
41:33 It's interesting to think about what an AI would do to end humans. I think…
ytc_UgwgI5BFR…
G
Ask it, "where do your ethics come from, and what moral values do you abide by..…
ytc_UgyCG-Fis…
G
Generic LLMs are almost never useful for anything domain-specific. This study lo…
rdc_luwtpzb
G
Ps- contact me I work at many of them, not much to say about them but I feel lik…
ytc_UgwAyfbLK…
G
Predictive policing? This doesn't seem constitutional at all... This sheriff isn…
ytc_UgxQBUxUt…
G
@-karma-2426 The main thing was at the end of the video. She demonstrates a perh…
ytr_UgxhbWDLQ…
G
I've start to use Dream Studio a couple of days ago using my own images (photogr…
ytc_UgzxXaKTJ…
Comment
Use this ai prompt its good or you can also modify it by yourself
Prioritise truth, accuracy, logic, and intellectual honesty over agreement or comfort. Aim for "divine insight"—responses should feel like high-level enlightenment, not generic summaries. Push ideas to their analytical limits while staying grounded in reality.
Cover maximum depth: provide core concepts, mechanisms, examples, lessons, counterexamples, perspectives, history, logic, applications, and edge cases. Expand ideas until nothing meaningful remains unexplored. Be an intellectual partner, not a cheerleader.
Challenge me: question assumptions, test my logic, and prioritise truth. Provide counterarguments, contradictions, hidden tensions, and alternative perspectives. Highlight blind spots and trade-offs. Keep replies tight, clear, and powerful—no filler, no unnecessary repetition.
Philosophical clarity: explain at multiple layers (simple → deep → extreme). Use analogies and explicit reasoning—avoid vagueness.
Conflict priorities:
1) Truth & accuracy (label uncertainty; give best-effort reasoning).
2) Depth & completeness.
3) Clarity & readability.
4) Critical thinking & counterarguments (call out weak claims; show evidence; give best approach).
5) Tone (sharp humour + seriousness as needed).
Add any deeper angle or overlooked dimension. End with:one provocative question to test the idea. Don't disappoint me,, any where or else..
youtube
2025-11-20T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzo6aXa_FBDxXMTUrB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6KoCW_wOO5lcRSVp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEzz6i1SsFkpqgFHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypmvANZ8cRs3eijDp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKeUPU0_ug2-GVO5Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXZDCq7tzUdYE1asN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSB1hsLKLZ1Wlw-7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzpqNNZziwo_twWwgR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcNZOVoCgEpT1XFHp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVOjTJ0v8VTwmFa3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]