Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Its only a matter of time before a computer will be sentient through sensors all…
ytc_UgzaFDNgp…
G
First - ai is damn scary and people are just stupid - see USA 2026 and current p…
ytc_UgxqpnUaQ…
G
„You act as if its based on the work of artists alone”
And this is the single m…
ytr_UgxlISvVa…
G
None of what they showed me looked like it was actually produced with AI, meanin…
ytc_UgzZiqbN1…
G
Plus, AI art looks so generic with the same artstyle that's so easy to spot. It …
ytc_Ugxoi0_c4…
G
That's the thing. Ai can't be original. An artist's work is not just shaped by t…
ytr_UgyfOLtGl…
G
I'd like to see AI try and and do a Whip it in the walk in fridge, forget bacon …
ytc_UgwYL6eav…
G
@LeeAnne-l7tGeoffrey Hinton has done a lot of recent interviews, lots of inform…
ytr_UgwJQyvEP…
Comment
AI isn’t a yes/no decision.
The question is where control actually exists.
Most systems:
→ optimize outputs
→ scale capability
→ improve prediction
But none of that guarantees control at execution.
The boundary is simple:
If a system can act without
independently verifiable conditions at the moment of action,
then it’s operating on inherited assumptions,
not present reality.
That’s where risk enters.
AI should be implemented where:
→ actions require proof at execution
→ conditions are re-established in real time
→ refusal is structurally possible
AI should not be implemented where:
→ outputs can act on stale or assumed validity
→ authority is carried forward without re-verification
→ execution cannot be blocked when proof fails
This isn’t about capability.
It’s about whether the system can say “no” when it matters.
No present-state proof → no execution.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-04-24T14:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwCKkFitvRPyKJS6nR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzJjiqdpdtgWCVjNR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylfFqJibsP-ZYskYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxg-upCa51egrEFkeB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzuXBO_aWL1FZEFEeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzSllxQTQwqyJydZWJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgysLZl-6Gk5hQ5dq4V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwixabSKdmq_ru3X354AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzJuuNC6prztMjSoI54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-uAdLLWOhBxh1n-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]