Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G "AI Colonialism" is inevitable without the good work from Blake and others in it… ytc_UgyQJLnVu… G And the other majority are from new accounts who have post history turned off an… rdc_ohz7eqk G First time to your channel. Wow, both you and NDT have some major bias, just li… ytc_UgwxVWoBz… G An interesting question I have had recently regarding ChatGPT is if it causes le… ytc_Ugy3fQVl8… G Okay... i don't drive, but i'm pretty sure it is illegal to go above the speed l… ytc_Ugyp_NGsp… G If you are a developer you should understand the hard limitations of these LLMs,… ytr_UgwdnH14L… G Your comment is all over the place and doesn't make much sense. I can blame the … ytr_UgxkVtyWO… G Holy Ghost fire against any demonic entities inside A.I humanoid robots In The … ytc_Ugw9w2V9R…

Comment

One of these days I am just going to report this channel for misinformation and start blocking it. For the record, when Computer Animation and 3D animation first came around, it was the same argument, but to get the REAL details out: 1. The surpreme court simply did not hear the case, meaning it did not make a ruling. This meant the previous ruling of the lower court held, which of course stated that you need substantial human involvement or human authorship. 2. AI art CAN be copyritten as long as there was substantial human authorship. It was not the fact that the plantive was wrong, it was the fact the way the plantive argued the case that was wrong 3. It was done without prejudice, meaning it can return to the court if he redoes the argument which happens a lot. Legal Eagle did a video on this a long time ago and figured the case was going to go this way when it was passed to the court. He stated clearly that more than likely it was going to fail not because it shouldn't be eligable, but because the way the argument was framed. But here is the issue. Some company desgined a new rocket nozel using AI, and it WAS copyrighted 2 years ago, meaning if he redid his argument he coudl appeal. I doubt he will, but I can bet a big studio problem will eventually.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2026-03-05T23:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	unclear
Reasoning	mixed
Policy	unclear
Emotion	mixed
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxwbsq1CUZ2VRgM-IF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFgHxyWGI5guKQsd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMC035gxMGZXBpxOt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2lMfdgellbAz39kB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyPC1vVTCPK0jGsMZ54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwytTozUG9fjo3oVxV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLrqQD4AzL1noj3p94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfZKdZU0HsFb2BT4R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWGi5JT_ngyjZrsb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugysp4ozPG8ey5gvPK54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses