Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Long live AI, if we have to displace all you much of losers will be just worth i… ytc_UgxWp7QAx… G AI will take a lot of jobs away but it’s not killing off humanity unless we allo… ytc_UgzqV6T3I… G Just a lot of sloppy use of vocabulary still going on here, and the examples for… ytc_UgzLiBYWb… G What's going to happen is AI will take over. Then there will be no humans to car… ytc_Ugxw5RieN… G Based on your description of the case, I was wondering if McGee would have any r… ytc_UgxZ2O-k-… G Truly transformative technology is obvious from the start. People saw the smartp… ytc_UgzwfAcjU… G All these comments about people’s various interactions with their own AI. All I … rdc_nm15p5q G The reason there is a double standard is simple: People who cannot create with t… ytc_UgxSdWq_W…
Comment
>Bill 757, makes it a felony to create, share or even possess AI-generated sexually explicit images ***of someone*** without consent Emphasis mine, because it is doing a lot of work. How will courts determine if an AI image is "of someone", and not just an AI image that is remarkably similar? Will they require proof of process?
reddit AI Harm Incident 1759474228.0 ♥ 57
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitygovernment
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_kvy2nhu","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_kvy3yg5","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_kvzbazy","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_kvy775s","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_nhi66kw","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"} ]