Raw LLM Responses

This is a terrible ruling. > While cameras generated a mechanical reproduction of a scene, she explained that they do so only after a human develops a “mental conception” of the photo, which is a product of decisions like where the subject stands, arrangements and lighting, among other choices. The exact same argument could be made in favor of AI. If I tell an AI that I want a woman standing near the camera wearing hiking gear with a valley behind her with mist in it on a sunny morning, I have created a picture in my head of what I want. Maybe the AI outputs what I wanted. Maybe it doesn't. But a camera is not guaranteed to give you the output you desire either. Most people who take photos don't know how the photo is going to ultimately turn out. They might have wanted a blurry background but didn't know how to set the aperature and f stop to achieve that result. Or what of a photographer who takes a picture of the sky only to capture a meteor by sheer luck? Does he not own the copyrght to his photo because of the serendipitious meteor appearing there that he did not plan for? In addition, there are now tools for AI which allow you to give it a picture of a person in a particular pose, and generate that same pose. And you can re-pose them by moving pins. And you can adjust the lighting by passing in images with the sort of lighting you want. This judge's interpretation of what AI does is extremely narrow and she clearly thinks you click a button and an image pops out and it could be anything. That isn't how it works at all.