Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@Dragon-1-1-5 You know, I actually like talking to AI haters. The enemies are mu…
ytr_UgyxB9qSt…
G
If your giving the AI to work and replace people!! who will going to buy your pr…
ytc_UgzMKOJ7D…
G
We've embraced it at my company. We both deploy our own chat interface and AI mo…
rdc_l5az0sb
G
Now men know know what it was like when we women were little girls and played wi…
ytc_Ugw8Uhb4b…
G
Note that consciousness is completely unnecessary in order for a system to act a…
ytr_Ugy3ivKUg…
G
Thanks for your excitement! 🌟 Sophia definitely brings a unique perspective on w…
ytr_UgzbVDbTd…
G
Me : i love you
Bot : stupid I'm already committed
Me : 😪
Bot : Robert as a …
ytc_UgwiucQpP…
G
@ghostlyethos And when this is the kind of counter argument I receive I am only …
ytr_UgyKHlwbv…
Comment
The problem with CoPilotX as i understand it is that its still out of the blue who owns the code.. We are of course going to see LLMs used for various professions as a helpful tool but yeah, not going to replace anything and we got quite a way to go.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1682180063.0
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jha5gtm","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jhb7ahv","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jha8uz4","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_jhcf5ze","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jhb69kr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]