Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@SaulStephenFilms I said it is possible in a panpsychist sense but that is a non…
ytr_UgzXEol_a…
G
AI is a computer program not an animal or a person. What, did you expect it to s…
ytc_UgxwjyMh0…
G
Where's the regulation? AI can be so much for the human race, but it needs to b…
ytc_Ugx_a6D-L…
G
The FT seems to have pretty low standards for balanced arguments. Most of this v…
ytc_UgxYkpicR…
G
Well... the Chinese Room analogy is wrong. We HAVE actually been told how to res…
ytc_Ughs4I7Ka…
G
@BirdsNation To some extend, it is a wave rising up fast and it will spread arou…
ytr_UgxW0lM_f…
G
So what did "Special-interests-Hawley" ask first? How "LLMs trained on media die…
ytc_UgwVJHPB-…
G
But then those high salaries will shift from programmers towards AI Engineers? A…
ytc_UgwLwhdWy…
Comment
We've embraced it at my company. We both deploy our own chat interface and AI model and use co-pilot for eng. It's made me marginally more productive, but specifically for debugging I've found I get to the solution much faster than I used to.
reddit
AI Jobs
1716461187.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_l58opf8","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_l58vao8","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_l591tjf","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_l59dnj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_l5az0sb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]