Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Because for whatever reason journalists seem to want to put an exact amount in their headline. This has always been stupid practice when dealing with virus outbreaks. The real number is most likely way above 83, and we have absolutely no way of knowing an exact number (how could we know?), and it's also constantly changing (it's a dynamic system). Yet they make it sound like there are exactly 83 instead of phrasing it differently. Maybe those journalists just don't understand basic biology, or maybe they get hard ons for exact amounts in head lines, I don't know. Either way, headlines like this are a disservice to journalistic practice.
reddit Cross-Cultural 1638013126.0 ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_hm7dg82","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_hm89qn8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_hm9jiia","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_hm7h3e0","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_hm883ea","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"} ]