Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Reno Perry Absolutely. Calm energy becomes leadership very quickly under pressure.

Blossom Affia Technical ability matters, but emotional steadiness is what holds teams together under stress. Thanks for sharing.

Love this pragmatic approach, Ruben. Taking the time on Day 3 to train the AI on your specific voice and banning certain fluff words is such a great tip. Building a repeatable, automated system definitely beats spending hours learning tools you'll never use. Great checklist!

George Stern Great insight. Do you think EQ becomes more important as responsibility increases?

Justin Mecham The more we understand ourselves, the better we respond to others with intention and empathy. Thanks for sharing.

This is a brilliant framework. Most people treat AI like a feature, but your "anatomy" analogy perfectly captures why enterprise AI is actually about system design. The "nervous system" (MCP) is the most overlooked layerintelligence is useless if it’s trapped in a silo. Looking forward to reading more on this.

Bea Sonnendecker Emotional intelligence matters most when stress tests how people respond and lead. Thanks for sharing.

Surely BoJo is evidence that this has been happening at Oxford for many many years

The 'brain' analogy is spot on, but the real challenge lies in integrating that with existing workflows. how do you see teams overcoming the inertia of legacy systems to leverage the brain effectively?

Most people never get past “chatbot mode.” The real unlock is treating Claude like a teammate, not a toy.

So many people think high EQ means suppressing feelings but it’s actually about understanding emotions and using that understanding to lead better.

day 3 is the underrated one tbh — the You.md file idea changed how i use it. once i added context about my workflow and what kind of feedback i actually want, the outputs feel way more like a thinking partner than a tool. been using it for data science projects at UQ and the difference between sessions with vs without context is pretty wild

Owning mistakes is something most people avoid and this unlocks doors for growth. Studying and working on yourself for the betterment is the safest investment. Thanks for these great insights. Justin Wright

The distinction between what EQ isn't versus what it is really highlights how often self awareness gets confused with people pleasing in workplace dynamics.

totally! high EQ really separates good leaders from the rest.

Exactly, clarity is what makes complex systems actually usable, Karina.

the “first 7 days” plan is smart because it forces reps instead of rabbit holes. every time i try to learn Claude by collecting 50 prompt tricks, i end up with a messy doc and nothing i can reuse next week. but if you spend week one just building one “how i work” file and running a tiny daily workflow on real tasks, it stops feeling like a chatbot and starts feeling like a setup you can actually rely on

The strongest part here is the sequencing from context → personalization → integration → automation. Most people never reach the later stages because they treat each feature as optional instead of cumulative. But the real unlock only happens when Claude is continuously fed with real work artifacts and connected systems that reflect how the job actually runs.

If capital keeps fleeing Dubai there may only be 50% of the work for Ai...

My super agents can connect to any MCP GitHub or API via a text message http://AgenetOC.ai