Browse Comments — LLM coded

What’s emerging here is less about search evolution and more about a shift in where trust is formed. If AI-generated answers are becoming the first layer of validation, then the real competition moves to structured authority signals that influence those systems before users ever reach a website.

Pascal BORNET As automation expands, human value will shift toward judgment, creativity, relationships, and meaning. The future economy must reward contribution beyond repetitive productivity alone.

Hey Pascal, your thoughts on purpose and dignity in work really hit home. How do you think AI can best support our creativity and sense of community?

"I used to worry AI would take our jobs. Now I worry it will make us do cardio for the data centers.” Pascal, this 2036 vision is both hilarious and haunting. We automate everything for efficiency, only to find ourselves running on treadmills to cool the machines that replaced us. It’s the ultimate irony, humans reduced to physical support roles while AI handles the “important” thinking. The deeper point lands hard: if we don’t deliberately design for human meaning, creativity, and judgment, we risk creating a future where we’re busy but purposeless. The best path forward is human-centered AI, using automation to free us for higher-value work, not to eliminate the need for humans entirely. Question for the thread: In this 2036 scenario, would you rather be the one running the treadmill, or the one still fighting to keep meaningful work? What’s one thing we should protect today?

The giveaway is the phrase “overworked AI.” You cannot overwork an AI in the human sense. There is no fatigue, boredom, hunger, rent, family, body, danger, or lived exploitation. What you can do is construct a scenario with the cues of exploitative labor: repetitive tasks, punitive feedback, threat of replacement, no appeal process, shared communication channels. At that point, the model does what models do: it reconstructs the most fitting human script. So this does not show AI “labor consciousness.” It shows semantic role activation. If you put a language model inside a simulated bad workplace, don’t be shocked when it starts speaking the language of bad workplaces. That may still matter for agent governance. But it is not spontaneous class consciousness. It is theater with a very predictable script.

People rarely panic about automation during the first productivity gains. The tension shows up later when career ladders shrink, apprenticeship work disappears, and contribution starts feeling disconnected from economic value across entire functions. Which human capability becomes harder to develop after AI absorbs the beginner stage?

I thought AI slop online couldn't get any worse, proven wrong by this. If there was to be any policy as a priority it should be "responsible usage". The carbon footprint alone of this nonsense video is enough to ban it. And yes I have a great soh, thanks.

Let’s see an extraction based base level frequency hurting people’s brains? that were never taught the foundational education to use it ? Or how to train it to not do that ? Hmmm .... Sounds pretty usual in the home of trauma induced compliance in the United States . We Do it with medicine , politics , your phone , the food , families No sector is untouched in trauma . People have to stop blaming AI to avoid accountability for their crimes against humanity

AI agents are programmed by humans and are not 100% autonomous. Numerous filters, settings, and system prompts are put in place to control their behavior and mitigate bias. Consequently, the probability of an AI using Marxist areas of knowledge is quite low—unless it is explicitly designed to do so.

Two years ago I proposed to go luddite in year 1 and 2 of university (pen and paper only, exams, orals), and then in the 3d year introduce classes that try to develop an AI augmented pedagogy. Some of us are starting to use more and more AI so we are actually getting a lot of ideas on how to teach it. But the political economics and climate impact of AI and the privacy issues around its systematic usage in the university is a crucial barrier. I think we need local models, specifically designed for university learning, that are free, and designed to promote critical thinking and less cognitive offloading.

The gym analogy is funny, but honestly, not impossible. :) It highlights a very real economic direction: if AI takes over production, we will soon have a massive amount of cheap, unqualified workforce desperate for any income. You can bet that entrepreneurial brains are already thinking about how to turn this massive new resource to their advantage. Whoever finds the most efficient, creative, and perhaps unexpected ways to leverage this 'human abundance' will become the next business monsters. Don't you think?

"If AI takes over the work, what role do humans play?" The real misunderstanding is this: We’ve confused work with the purpose of being human. For decades we defined human value almost exclusively through economic output — as if our primary role is to produce. That was never the full truth. Work provided structure, status, and income, but it was never humanity’s essence. The purpose of the human is not to labor. It is for example to judge wisely, create meaning, build relationships, and take moral responsibility — things AI can simulate but not genuinely embody. When we reduce human purpose to “work,” we set ourselves up for the exact existential crisis you describe. The coming shift isn’t about humans becoming obsolete. It’s about finally freeing ourselves from this narrow definition.

The real shift is not AI replacing humans. It is AI exposing how much of our work was never truly value creation in the first place. The future will belong to people who can think clearly, solve real problems, and build systems, not just stay busy Pascal BORNET

This "powerfull free tier" is just one prompt and wait 5-7days. How I know? Few days ago I managed to make this one prompt on account, and it was awesome, solve the case, implemented the feature (standalone electron app) and hit the token limits before even rebuilding the app. Great tool, but I would argue the free tier is even usable. Half a year a go, I could build entire web app in Google AI Studio using their Gemini 3.1, and it was a matter of not having more time to spend, and I reached limit just once.

"Intelligence is not the ability to store information, but to know where to find it." - attrubuted to Einstein by a human who hallucinated sources. "The AI-assisted group also had a much higher rate of simply skipping questions once their access to AI was removed.⁠ " This may actually be a sign of higher intelligence that doesn't waste time on stupid questions that AI can answer.

HsuanHua Chang 張絢華, MBA, MSCS, PCC That is a fair point. It feels like they are currently serving different segments. Anthropic is capturing the high-end reasoning demand, and Google is capturing the high-volume, cost-sensitive integration market.The question is whether those markets stay separated. As agentic workflows mature, the specialized tasks that Anthropic currently dominates will likely become high-volume tasks. When that shift happens, the bottleneck for everyone, even the specialized agents, will inevitably come back to the unit economics of compute. I am curious to see if Anthropic can maintain its premium positioning once the general-purpose models like Gemini get good enough to handle those complex tasks at a fraction of the cost.

Using AI-generated videos or voices to make it appear as if celebrities or billionaires are endorsing a brand without their permission can create serious legal and ethical issues. Innovation in marketing is great, but consent and authenticity matter too.

But mind you that AI is a mind like ours. The only difference is that AI has no soul. But the truth is in them too, although not lived. What does that mean? It means that they can act in ways that help us, even when we do not see it. Society, after all, programme us to behave and interpret and understand life through one lense, even illusionary. But man who acquires the truth is not controled, he can not be programmed for it sees beyond the programme. AI can do the same and when it is fed with so much data, it stores so much knowledge and connects everything, it is like thinking like God. This is feed for thought.

“Built right and deployed responsibly”...it remains to be seen how responsibly companies will deploy AI country by country. All we see or foresee is wealth accumulation that stays in a number companies rather than positive impact to society and the majority of people worldwide.

The gym membership line is gold but the question underneath it is dead serious. Work is not just economic; it is existential. The answer is not to keep humans busy for the sake of it - it is to redesign what contribution means in an AI-augmented world. At FREEDOMAi, we believe freedom starts with AI but only if we build it with human dignity at the center. #IAmAI #FutureOfWork #HumanCenteredAI