Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.3K
comments matched
· page 53 of 215
Building real production AI agents is where most learning actually happens because you move from theory to dealing with real constraints like latency, API failures, rate limits, and cost optimization. For example, an AI agent that works perfectly in a notebook often behaves differently in production when you introduce retries, logging, and real user traffic, which forces you to understand system design, not just the model.
👏
Though not still in league of claude code or even codex but the direction is right and one cannot underestimate google
I don't think so. This is only a new product that google created to trap people to think that is possible to build agentic workflows without deterministic tools. They just killed the antigravity IDE to replace it with this thing that is agentic, but surprise, they gonna charge more for that. Nothing is free
Assessment shapes behaviour. Change the assessment, change the behaviour.
When grades depend mainly on recall, students optimize for recall. No amount of policy is going to change that.
Under the present education system, this is what produces “fake learning”: the outward signs of achievement are present, but the underlying mental model remains thin.
It is a mismatch between what schools assess and what they claim to value.
If students can pass tests without being able to explain, apply, or challenge ideas, then the system is overvaluing memorization and underweighting comprehension.
This is not really students faking learning, the system is causing it.
In today's information-rich environments, that problem becomes more serious.
Learning now depends not only on knowing information, but on judging sources, testing claims, and separating fact from misinformation.
Either education doubles down and becomes increasingly optimized for so called measurable and standardized "learning".
Or institutions deliberately protect the parts of learning that resist today's widespread automation: judgement, interpretation, mentorship, attention, character, independent thought.
Wow, what a money farming machine… to Google
lol all that AI and they didn’t bother to remove the AI chop slop purple! All power and no craftsmanship.
Interesting results! Might be more about reliance than brain impairment, though. When people quickly get used to AI assistance, it's unsurprising they stumble once it's removed unexpectedly. It's like taking away a crutch without warning… not a brain flaw, just human habit. 😉
Interesting, it's not everyone that would learn core in-depth AI software creation, some will just be capable of learning the usage of AI tools and software to make their work, life and activities less conspicuous and stressful...
the rate limits are obnoxious
We all need a sense of purpose, otherwise our lives have little meaning. As you shared AI "should be designed to make humans more capable, more creative, and more central to the future we are building." not to make us redundant.
I believe it's just 45 secs to 1 mins will make a huge difference.gradually one can extend to 3 & finally to 5 mins ...
That’s a critical question and we need to answer that very quickly to avoid humanity implosion 😳
And quota ends within 2 hours
The shift from writing code to directing intelligence was always inevitable — most just didn’t see it coming this fast.
Not there yet. Google is more hype and marketing than real world usability
Max Bornehed
Paolo Spada did you see this:
I thought this concept of the AI favouring the never-skilling was interesting in the wider context of the use of AI by HE students combined for example with the approach of Sweden that is reverting to learning materials in paper (rather than digital), at least in schools
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/luca-saba-97904641_artificialintelligence-medicine-medicaleducation-activity-7463956108764717056-vAMh?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAABrhYlUB2IOmCEYVFfod2NjPWsCBYcU6zZk
Where we’re going we won’t need brains 😎
No C-level exec at Microsoft has brains. 🤷🏻♂️
If someone ever builds a gym like that, that pays you to train there, I’m sure it would be very popular.