Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

This is beginning to sound like the Matrix ... Human are just going to be powerful source for the machines :(.. very dystopian outlook though.

This is the core of the 'Human Hunt' in 2026, Pascal. We aren't just looking for people who can use AI; we're looking for leaders who can redesign participation so that 'abundance' doesn't lead to an 'existential crisis.' The most valuable skill in an AI-native world isn't technical—it's the ability to define the 'human' purpose that the machines are serving.

its all kinda policy like make them dependent on a tool , after some time charge heavily

John W. C. Your indignation is righteous, but placement matters just as much. Your position isn't the problem here.

These realistic anatomical images are creeping me out. They're everywhere

Amazing!

I am still not able to understand why everyone is highlighting you can run AI company in your laptop...are we solving business problem with the help of technology or creating more problems for business...😊

Since I am not a Software professional but a Medical professional can’t comment on the technical side but conceptually the conversion of the standard laptop into a high end developer tool ( and perhaps more so with the new “ hybrid “ chips available and in the pipeline which allow Small Language models to run effectively ) is truly a landmark 👍

AI impacts work, but human compliance expertise is crucial. Navigating TTB and state alcohol licenses demands nuanced interpretation and strategic judgment. AI aids, yet final oversight is human.

cost?

AI's optimal role is to empower, not replace. In federal and state alcohol compliance, including TTB, AI can manage complex data, allowing experts to focus on strategic judgment and decision-making, elevating contribution.

IEEE 802.15.6

i love the line about ai doing the thinking and robots doing the work, humans doing spin class to keep the servers alive hit hard. it’s a playful setup that lands a serious reminder: if we remove people without redesigning participation, we’re left with an existential mess.

Claude code still the better one.

We will adjust as we had with the calculator. And I would argue that it doesn't hurt your brain, it just changes the sets of skills needed and valued Unfortunatlly the system based on greed does not fit well with the newer technologies. Instead of creating an utopia is creating a distopia. Due to the system based on greed not being compatible. It will take a very big war before that happens.

Then you are using AI the wrong way.

Raymond Lee I saw it commonly home exercises, so can be said traditional. Many of todays recommended common person physical activities are similar the one we did in school time in morning assembly time. There should be no harm for pushing some to brain by gravity.

93 agents? Insanity

Perhaps the next era of human value will not be defined by repetitive productivity… …but by our ability to:-> imagine-> empathize-> collaborate-> make ethical decisions-> continuously reinvent ourselves The future should not be:“Humans serving machines.” It should be:“Machines amplifying human potential.” That may become one of the most important leadership, societal, and philosophical conversations of the AI era. https://chandanpatary.com/unlock-ai-agility

Horrendous usage limits - especially disappointing because they own the infrastructure…by comparison Nvidia’s NIM api is essentially free. Pair that with a harness like OpenWork/OpenCode. OpenCode actually now offers models like DeepSeek V4 Flash on a generous free tier plus a decent plan at $10/month: https://opencode.ai/go?ref=60R9CHNXRN