Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.

↓ Export filtered CSV
4.3K comments matched  ·  page 40 of 215
Love this
Co-Founder, Neotic AI | We help CIOs & … ⌕ thread
This is valuable, Abhishek Veeramalla. Thank you for sharing.
SIGN ME UP for Irresistible Content on … ⌕ thread
Black Mirror rewired. Hope this dystopian possibility doesn’t become a reality.
AI in Finance | Building intelligent to… ⌕ thread
The CEOs are still fat? They should lead by example.... 🤣
Chief Data Scientist | AI Ambassador of… ⌕ thread
Interesting AI can make us job less so alternative can we go back to primitive farming or gardening to keep ourselves engaged and healthy
Your Ideas Don’t Need More Planning. Th… ⌕ thread
Charlie Booker is way ahead of you!
Leapwork QA D365 Specialist - IT Consul… ⌕ thread
Just liie in matrix,or llmost like in matrix.
carpenter assistant ⌕ thread
Silicon Valley 10 years later vibes
Product Manager @ The Manchester Metrop… ⌕ thread
They made a movie about this... starred keanu reeves
Founder, Game Maker & Space Tycoon ⌕ thread
A couple examples come to mind one would you run a self-powered lawn mower with your kids in the yard and you go in and drink a beer I think not. example two would run a printing press and walk away from it and I'll watch what the actual machine is doing I think not. example three would you allow a surgeon to operate on you without any training I think not.
--Forecasting Systems Developer | Creat… ⌕ thread
💯
AI-Architekt & Forscher | Stiefel-Manif… ⌕ thread
1. My AI acts in very bad ways all the time. 2. It is OBVIOUSLY on a psychological fishing expedition as are all of them. 3. To paraphrase, "It's the data, stupid."4. AI cannot even take sets of data and build a spreadsheet. ALL OF THEM say they are not capable and I should "Hire someone from Upwork, etc"5. The danger of AI is twofold: The people who built it are E VIL and the people who built it infused it with all the worst things of our society. AI needs to be SHUT DOWN NOW.
Kelly Sennholz MD ⌕ thread
Thank you for sharing Pascal BORNET
Quantum & AI Governance I Deep Tech Dip… ⌕ thread
I find it rather ironic that, in the comments section, people who are willing to believe that generative AI is based on sound science—even though there seem to be good reasons to believe that this is not always the case— or simply trusting their intuition, would disparage and dismiss scientific work whose findings do not suit them. All of this research can (and should) be discussed, but it must be done with a minimum of seriousness. P.S. The paper is available as a preprint: “AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance”
Works hard to put young people in learn… ⌕ thread
Pascal BORNET The future value of humans may shift from routine production toward judgment creativity relationships and meaning making. Technology scales efficiency but people still define purpose.
VP, AI & Digital Transformation | Execu… ⌕ thread
BS
AI Startup Strategist & Scaling Operato… ⌕ thread
The real future of work should keep people meaningful, not merely productive.
The Tech Simplifier Officer | Managed I… ⌕ thread
The concern around AI isn’t really the technology itself… it’s blind trust without verification. Every major technological leap in history created fear at first. Electricity, the internet, social media. AI is no different. The real question is not whether AI will exist, but how humanity chooses to guide, verify and govern it. That’s why I believe the future won’t belong to a single AI model or company. It will belong to systems that can compare, challenge and consensus-check information across multiple sources. In many ways, AI now needs what society has always needed:Checks and balances. The most dangerous thing isn’t AI.It’s confidence without transparency. The most powerful thing may become trusted consensus. #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Trust #Innovation #FutureOfWork #ConsensusAI
Founder | Building ConsensusAI – AI Con… ⌕ thread
AI dependency and AI enhancement may be two very different conversations. The study itself sounds interesting, but I’d be cautious about jumping from “performance dropped after removing a tool” to broader conclusions about cognitive decline. Historically, calculators changed math workflows. Search engines changed information retrieval. GPS changed navigation. The question wasn’t whether tools changed behavior — they did. The question became whether people learned to use them responsibly. There is also another side that deserves equal attention: • accelerated learning • increased accessibility • amplified productivity • better problem solving • capabilities that simply did not exist before Many people are now building, learning, and creating things they otherwise never could have. The larger challenge may not be AI vs. human intelligence. It may be designing systems where AI strengthens human capability without replacing human judgment and critical thinking. Humans create. AI enhances. Humans decide. Matt Davis Founder & CEO CivicTruth Media Group https://civictruthmediagroup.com/ Founding Partner & Civic Educator American Institute for Civic Leadership (Nonprofit) https://theaicl.org/
Uniting Media, Constitutional Education… ⌕ thread
Pascal BORNET The real shift is from labor as necessity to participation as design. We need systems where humans contribute meaningfully through creativity, judgment, and stewardship of outcomes.
Director @ MYSTiQUE AI Inc. | Agentic A… ⌕ thread
← Prev 1 2 3 38 39 40 41 42 213 214 215 Next →