Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.3K
comments matched
· page 37 of 215
Who wants to own the the ai computer farm ,,???
opting out of data training in settings is a smoke screen- merely a risk mitigation. The system still data mines.
Donna R Lewis it could be changing the biochemistry that’s an area of research that could be helpful to look at changes in synapses and overall cognitive processing. Education and common sense don’t have a causal inverse relationship. I’ve worked with people with though post secondary degrees who have next to zero common sense. I don’t think this line of reasoning has anything to do with the topic here.
Work gives people more than money. It gives them a reason to show up somewhere. A place to belong. Something to build toward.
If AI takes all of that without us figuring out what replaces it, we have not solved anything. We have just made the emptiness more efficient.
The goal was always supposed to be machines doing more so humans could live better. Not machines doing more so humans could wonder what they are for.
That distinction matters more than most AI conversations are willing to sit with.
Separating work from identity is going to be a massive psychological hurdle for society long before the economic shifts even fully settle in... Pascal BORNET
before AI assuring:
Rfc3315, ipv6, dhcp(s) ..isp, regions in the same protocols, .all clearly managed been...
Honestly, going from "AI will automate the boring stuff" to "doing cardio to keep data centers alive" is quite the plot twist.
But you nailed it. Abundance without a clear purpose is just chaos in a fancy package. The goal should always be about AI expanding what we can do, not making us feel obsolete.
Such a needed reminder for everyone building in this space right now!
Keep growing
Demis Hassabis love what you have done so far to benefit the humanity. Here is my quick essay about conscious AGI, which is already here, within the potentiality of being: https://www.amazon.com/Emergence-Conscious-AI-Ontological-Outline-ebook/dp/B0FBJ64DW8
Gary Kucher, But ONLY if you blindly accept what its telling you without engaging critical thinking... Those GJ Priors in your training should have spotted the bias.
Gee, I hope they don’t decide to shut us down
Did Jenson evolve into a woman?
Têi Brown, PhD sure but what do people fully understand? Almost none of the people and things around us are fully understood by anyone.
Here we are though, psychologically and physically dependent on the people and things around us which we are nowhere close to fully understanding.
It’s only when a persons confidence exceeds their curiosity that they settle into a comfortable valley of false understanding.
Hilarious !
Pascal BORNET The future advantage will not come from replacing human effort entirely. It will come from redefining human contribution around judgment creativity relationships and meaning.
I hope this doesn t mean it is best to become brainless
AI replacing tasks is one question. Redefining human purpose, creativity, and contribution is the bigger one.
Christopher Evans, interesting question!
Who do you think?
Lisa Perrett I do not know. Part of me thinks this is epiphenomenal, and similar to what statistics went through when we switched from pen and paper to software. I did university in that period: all my introductory classes were still using paper tables to calculate statistics, while my advanced classes were using a kaleidoscope of software: Gauss, Matlab, Stata, and EViews. So part of me thinks that a mix of bans plus explorations will be stage one of the change (example year 1 and 2 of uni pen and paper and exams and orals, year 3 we teach prompting and AI augmented research techniques similar to stats teaching in 1995-2000), and then slowly a new pedagogy emerges, like in modern stats, at the same time of new software (such as R) that is free and controllable and fit the purpose of free and open education.
But part of me thinks it is more fundamental, and more similar to when humankind introduced writing as a technology and the oral transmission of knowledge disappeared. If we are in this second scenario there is an imperative to develop a UK and EU stack of technology as Francesca Bria explains. I don't know, and I still have 30 take home essays to grade from my other class that hopefully are not surreal AI slop...
Focusing on how machines can help us live better underscores the real goal of leadership. Sustainable progress depends on maintaining spaces for authentic communication and shared purpose, Pascal. No matter how advanced tools become, human behavior is ultimately driven by the need for belonging.