Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
240
comments matched
· page 3 of 12
Just liie in matrix,or llmost like in matrix.
Silicon Valley 10 years later vibes
They made a movie about this... starred keanu reeves
Thank you for sharing Pascal BORNET
Pascal BORNET The future value of humans may shift from routine production toward judgment creativity relationships and meaning making. Technology scales efficiency but people still define purpose.
The real future of work should keep people meaningful, not merely productive.
Pascal BORNET The real shift is from labor as necessity to participation as design. We need systems where humans contribute meaningfully through creativity, judgment, and stewardship of outcomes.
The MATRIX human batteries is the more likely outcome 😂
The real question with AI is not replacement, but participation. How people stay meaningfully involved is far more critical.
Pascal BORNET The real question is not job displacement but value reallocation. As AI handles execution, human focus must shift toward judgment, meaning, and system direction.
Pascal BORNET The deeper shift is from labor based identity to value based contribution. Human work will matter most where judgment, creativity, and meaning making cannot be automated.
The deeper issue for me is that there is still a long distance between an LLM and a reliably deployable worker-like system, so I would be careful with any clean narrative about AI simply "doing most of the work". The more plausible near-term path is narrower: specialized systems supporting bounded and repetitive tasks, while shifting a great deal of effort into verification, integration, exception handling, and governance. In many cases the work does not disappear. It moves. And that is before the larger complexity problem even begins. Economic roles, institutional structures, incentives, and social expectations do not reconfigure in straight lines. They interact, adapt, and generate second- and third-order effects that are hard to model in advance. So I agree with the importance of the question, but I think we should be careful with simplified futures. If greater prosperity is possible, that would be an extraordinary gain. But getting there requires much deeper thinking than the current wave of hype, fear, or linear extrapolation usually allows.
I love this perspective. AI should be our ally, not our replacement. Together, we can achieve so much more.
Samir Bico I can tell you have your hands on this already, only pain can cause such wisdom.
The best future isn’t humans competing with AI It’s humans using AI to do more meaningful work Pascal BORNET
People will need a sense of purpose
Why not making machines more efficient with human creativity and cognitive knowledge.
Matrix wasn’t far from that, human power batteries.
Nicholas Bach
Armağan Tekin, Thank you. I really appreciate that. Maybe it comes from staying curious about technology for a long time and from finding the most interesting questions where it meets the real world.