Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
240
comments matched
· page 10 of 12
Interesting because history shows productivity breakthroughs do not eliminate human work , they redefine it. The World Economic Forum estimates AI could create 170 million new roles globally by 2030 while displacing 92 million. The challenge is whether society can redesign education, incentives, and economic models fast enough for that transition. The future of work may become less about repetitive execution and more about creativity, judgment, coordination, and human connection.
This video hits deep
This is brilliant but also uncomfortable for the right reasons. The joke lands because the question underneath is real. What stood out for me is this shift: we keep asking what AI will do but not enough what humans are for. 🔵 From an EQAI lens, the answer isn’t “less work”, it’s different work: → judgment under uncertainty → meaning-making → building relationships → deciding what should be done, not just what can be done Because if AI takes execution, humans don’t disappear.
As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will need societal adjustment, as far as how humans and AI will co-exist. AI should remain an accelerator and facilitator, not a human displacement or replacement, though many jobs will be not just augmented, but eliminated.
lol Real thing would be human brain connected to AI data centres for rent to do computing with lowest possible energy use. Your 8 hr shift would be lying down, connected to neural-ink and disconnected from conscious body for that time while serverless compute executes workloads on it. Perfect sequel to that Apple TV series about mind memory lock by office!? 😅
I never heard biggest bulshit than this
This shows most peoples' lack of vision and creativity if we believe that's all collective human intelligence will amount to.
Wasn’t this a black mirror episode?
The scary part about AI isn’t just job replacement. It’s that humans get meaning, identity, routine, and social connection from work too. Society is not psychologically prepared for that conversation yet.
The real question is not what humans will do when AI does the work. It is what humans will do when the work they currently do loses its social meaning. Work provides structure, status, and community. If we automate the output without replacing those three things, we get efficiency without dignity. Pascal naming redesign of participation as the unresolved problem is the hardest truth in the entire AI transition.
Do you honestly think it naturally follows that the net result will be AI, robotics and automation replacing the need for human contribution and we'll have some immediate crisis of purpose? I'd be more afraid of the social engineers stepping in to proactively design a world of purpose. What could go wrong?
Literally, The Matrix, playing out. I laughed thinking that the AI in the movie would need so much energy. Now we see why. 🤣🤣🤣
The funny part is that the joke makes the real fear easier to say. If AI removes work without replacing purpose, the problem won’t be unemployment alone. It’ll be identity.
Nice to see that those who run it all are fat as f... that keeps me sane :)
Work is not only income. It is structure, dignity, contribution and purpose. That is the part of this conversation most people skip straight past. Removing people from production without redesigning participation is not a prosperity story. It is an identity crisis at scale.
Black Mirror 😖
I wish we had this problem. I hate doing dishes and cleaning - where are the AIs taking that job from me? I'd love that
The humor aside, there is a real insight here. The relationship between humans and AI is going to look nothing like what most people predict. The businesses that figure out the right balance between automation and human judgment early are going to have a massive advantage over the ones still debating whether to adopt it at all.
Haha this is quite funny actually. I think there is going to be a reality, as Elon says, where we will not have to work anymore (universal basic income) and that will come much faster than people think actually. They predict that all computer and desk jobs will disappear in the next ten years. Everything will be run by AI and agents so I suppose we will have much more time and much more freedom and therefore there will be a lot of health issues actually because people are moving less. We move less and less. (Uber eats, e-com... If I had to give one thought about what is the best industry to work in in the next 20 years, it's going to be the food industry, the health industry, and the housing industry because those 3 industries will never change. The human body, up until now, still hasn't evolved in thousands of years and it will still need to have shelter, eat something, and be in good health. All the rest is completely obsolete due to AI and the arrival of quantum computers.
For one thing I think the fall will be far greater for the rich the day money becomes useless. Then the next step is unification, one world. No more separation of poor and rich. People will no longer live in places where environment is not sustainable.