Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

If there's ever been a strong argument for diversity in tech, it's this, the fact that some of AI'S most impactful and most powerful architects, are women, best of all, some of them, are Working Moms! 🔥❤️📌

Altering thoughts or behavior to appease machines (algorithms and data processing) forces self-censorship, curtails authentic expression, purpose, and suppresses individual identity. If AI does not improve and empower human cognition, creativity, and connection, it effectively reduces life to a source of productivity, comparing humans to machines based on speed and efficiency. Each of us was created for so much more! Referring to AI for answers based on the words and creations of humans eliminates the individual quest to explore, think, and act for one’s self. Outsourced thinking and beliefs to a non-human entity is the fastest path to eliminate human values, sovereignty, free will, and domain over the future of life, and the planet. In my humble opinion.

Paul, you've hit on something critical here. After two decades of watching enterprises drown in tool sprawl, I'm convinced workflow consolidation is where real ROI lives. The friction cost of context-switching between platforms often exceeds the subscription savings of "best-of-breed" point solutions. When teams spend more time managing their toolchain than delivering outcomes, something's broken. Unified environments that reduce cognitive load while maintaining capability depth? That's the strategic play smart CIOs are evaluating now.

I live in Utah. Our big sticking point on developing data centers for AI isn't energy per se. It's the lack of water needed to run the power generation and cool the processors.

What changes when AI lowers the cost of exploring ambitious ideas is the question itself, not just the speed of the answer.

Old Sport Dispatch Thanks for sharing, but our focus at Holdex is exclusively on infrastructure for DeFi and institutional-grade Web3 protocols. Best of luck with the initiative!

Is it really a safety failure to use a large-language model for medical guidance? Doesn't embedding the "solution" in the prompt simply double-down on this technology's limitations?

Oksana CANTAIS very well said

Holdex Everything is already done, for you it'll take 2(3) clicks to stop all the wars: 1. Subscribe to The Imagine project X account now 2. Support The Digital Strike on February 24 *3(optional). Share to speed up the end of 'wars era' P.S. We only need a support of 51% of humanity to make it work.

AppMakers USA looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Amina Nunn looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Yuva Raju Nadimpalle looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

AI4IT Services LLC looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Marcus O'Dell looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Ezio v.s Santos looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Virtual Solutions India looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project

Brendan Jephcott yeah I agree this is victim mentality, it’s only been a short while, he’s young he doesn’t get it

Old Sport Dispatch 請自行將事務驗證資料傳遞給我！ 此外我只接受現實見面洽談

Sandra Bray Excellent point. The troubling bits are at the systems level, including but not limited to water and minerals needed for GPU production, fossil fuel for construction, energy for treating water chockful of descaling chemicals, lack of purple piping, colocation with municipal water resources, noise pollution, e-waste, and so much more…

Really interesting angle. For me, the big shift is not just that AI makes research faster. It lowers the threshold for exploring ideas you might otherwise leave untouched because they feel too unclear, too time-consuming or too uncertain. But that only works if you can frame the question well. That is actually why I built Promptivity.dk: It is a free tool that helps turn a rough thought into a clearer prompt before using ChatGPT. Not because prompts are the goal but because better questions usually lead to better exploration.