Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.3K
comments matched
· page 179 of 215
The most important question isn't which tool wins—it's how people create value with it.
Others are mocking and Sam Altman and Sam Altman is standing with them? You need to change the prompt bro
That's the process, using the AI tools in a practical way, not just experimenting or a chatting tools. Thanks for sharing good content always Ruben Hassid
AI isn't replacing the need to think.
It's replacing the need to search.
Stack Overflow taught us to find answers.
AI is teaching us to build systems.
The developers losing out aren't the ones
using AI — they're the ones still treating
it like a search bar instead of a workflow.
I wrote a free chapter on exactly this shift
— how to stop using AI as a tool and start
building with it as a system. It's on my
profile if you want to check it out.
Genuine question back: do you think the
problem is AI, or how we're using it?
https://payhip.com/b/Avezg
𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐭𝐰
I'm very appreciative of using Google Gemini! Now, I'm even more excited to be using it on everything.
While I have my concerns about AI, I rarely posted on SO because the user base is very skilled at alienating the user base.
Dr Hinton was part of the problem! What a great success of rebranding oneself!
Love this insight! That's why thorough testing against good data will be the only way to make sure that an AI system is working properly and without bias!
Workflow complexity becomes the real barrier in AI maturity. Value increases when teams can move from idea to execution without constant context switching or revalidating outputs across platforms.
Bernie Sanders is chicken little: “The sky is falling, the sky is falling!” Be useful Bernie: don’t just point out issues, propose practical solutions to address the issues.
Perhaps, a trend reversel will happen if AI slop continues. Zig CEO says they don't want PRs based on AI slop and many PRs getting rejected as reviews require lots of effort for AI generated including the replies for the question asked.
Won't we need to continue using it so it can train the LLMs?
https://youtu.be/dgqN6s8KBQo?si=2WS5HkJbhcsbyNnV
"In conversation with OpenAI’s Mark Chen, Terence reflec..." - the part that doesn't get discussed enough. This is going to matter more than most people realise.
Many of us in data science now ask Ai for concise answers. Old inquiries to Stack Overflow required too many tries without truly narrowly answering our questions.
👁️
Stack
🍎🍐🫐🥝🍅🥑🍆🥕🥦🧄🧅🥬🫑🍄🍄🥜🫘🫚🍄🟫😉😉😉
I don't see it that way. I think that many AI engines are using data they have gathered from Stack!So more correct bottom part of picture, would be a turtle with his own copy of Rat master. :)